Wow you're actually retarded
Deadishot wrote:it lost money and ended SEGA's business of making gaming consoles.
How is that a success?
First of all the Dreamcast lost money because it was honestly ahead of it's time and was trying to utilize technology that couldn't fully be utilized (i.e. online play on consoles... i mean seriously it wasn't profitable until a year or two after PS2 came out). That sounds similar to something people rave about today... oh that's right. It's called the Playstation 3. Graphics capabilities that can't be used to their fullest potential among other things.
Deadishot wrote:breaking it down a little more...
It has a handful of good games, little to none third party support(SEGA fault), No backwards compatibility (in comparison to its main competitor ps3). and I hear you need a shitload of memory cards to save your info. Also the controllers are wack(this is a preference however)
Had far more than a handful of good games, but that's opinion. SEGA was making some of the best games of the time. Backwards compatibility to what? The Genesis? The Sega CD? The Saturn? That's just stupid. And since when did the PS3 come out in fucking 1998 (which is like almost 2 years before the PS2 came out)? I didn't need a "shitload" of memory cards. I had like 2 dozen games and maybe 4 memory cards. FAR less than I had for PS2. And the controller was awesome, but again that's opinion.
Deadishot wrote:i don't really know too much about it, but my main argument is that it ended SEGA's console business.
Losing money and ending a business.. i have a hard time seeing that as a success.
You could have said you didn't know what you were talking about in your original post and saved us all time. Oh and PS3 has lost Sony money up to this point. So what's that? The Failstation 3? Smfh.