Is The Death Penalty Right Or Wrong?

[hot_dogg]

its a good warning to people who plan on doing something big. u can always bust out of jail if u have enough people on ur side after all

[Fi.J.]

HELL NO!!!!!!!!!!!!I'm completely against death penalty..it's not takin someone's life that you make justice,even if this person killed.killing is always bad,is always a crime!!life is precious.
and then it's in a way easier for a person to die then to spend the whole life in jail.

[yoshi]

If I had to stay 60 yrs in prison, I'd rather die..

Plus there's no point in keeping them there, cause they only keep places occupied for criminals that haven't commited any serious crime. And there of course 10 000 other reasons for which they should've died after killing someone else.

[pimpin2ez]

This is kind of old but they killed a guy because they thought he murdered his wife then they found the true killer and all they did was apoligized 2 the family of the guy that was fucked up this is why they should be 100% sure someone commited a crime

[BLAHBLAHBLAH]

Yes they should be killed. What gives them the right to take another persons life ?

But couldn't you say that about the death penalty like what gives a judge the right to end someone life

i agree with the death penalty if they are 100% sure cause i have heard several cases were the person on death row was completely innocent but they were still gonna die

[Fi.J.]

HELL NO!!!!!!!!!!!!I'm completely against death penalty..it's not takin someone's life that you make justice,even if this person killed.killing is always bad,is always a crime!!life is precious.
and then it's in a way easier for a person to die then to spend the whole life in jail.

When they take someone elses life then what gives them the right to have the privlege to live? I know some people would probably rather die than spend the rest of their life in prison, but keeping them in there does cost money, and when they're dead they're dead, it's not like their gonna go "yey I'm dead, now I don't have to spend the rest of my life in prison". Lol I know thats a stupid example but once they're dead they're dead. They shouldn't have the right to live after taking another persons life, or sometimes even more than one..

ok,but a judge hasn't got the right to take his life,too,even if this person is a criminal.

[Shadyluva]

it really comes down to the situation...thatz just my opinion

[neha]

i'll say NO, but only in some cases YES

[yoshi]

Which are those cases?

[Ivy]

If the motherfucker killed more than 3 people, with clear evidence agaisnt him, kill his ass. None of this lethal ejection or shit like that. They probably made their victims suffer, so their asses need to suffer. I know one serial murderer who lived in Columbia, South Carolina. He killed over 150, known women, and raped even more. He raped a 7 month old child. A SEVEN MONTH old child, not molested, RAPED. It was his fucking niece. He killed the child by raping it. And he was tried and sentenced to death. He was on death row for 20 some years. Why? Because everytime his execution date got near, he'd plea with them saying if they longer his execution time he'll give them 1, 2, or even 3 more bodies so that the families with missing persons could rest in peace knowing that they finally know what happened to their loved one. They finally stopped putting off the execution and I think they fried his ass, I'm not sure on that one. His name was Pee Wee Gaskins. His last words before he was executed was he had 271 victims who were murdered and over 300 who were raped, but he let them get away. To this day, they have found no more bodies but the 150 that he gave to them. Sick motherfucker. He should have been tortured, and let some gay ass prisoners get their way with him. Motherfucker. May he burn in hell.

[Tomega]

no, of course not