Adam Quinn wrote:
Same thing I said
Are you posting in agreement? Or are you saying that I was being redundant in saying the same thing you did? Because if it's the latter, I'd have to say that
AbramIsaac wrote:Sorry, thought I'd point out that that statement is questionable at best. Not really speaking on your religion or anything like that, but the truth of the matter is: that's most likely a myth propagated by Christians.
It's based on an account by Elizabeth Reid ("Lady Hope", an evangelist). She said she visited Darwin on his death bed and he recanted his theory of evolution and converted to Christianity. This account isn't supported by Darwin's children, and his daughter was present throughout his illness and stated that Lady Hope was never present, and that she didn't think that Lady Hope and Charles ever met.
Just thought I'd point that out, because I'm sure you wouldn't want to spread falsehood.
As far as the topic goes, I'd say I probably support evolution, it makes sense to me.
And
Adam Quinn wrote:That sounds like a theory backed and put out by religious groups. I'm a full blown atheist.
Aren't exactly the same thing. Same theme, perhaps...if you were just saying that my post was an affirmation to your view, then I'd have to agree.
Religion has spread alot of such misinformation about science.