I find in debates over whether weed should be legalized there is a point that comes up often for the pro-legalization side that I found just plain stupid.
Now don't get this thread wrong I am not trying to say weed should be illegal. Just simply refuting one stupid argument that I hear surprisingly often. Which is 'alcohol is worse for you and alcohol is legal, therefore weed should be'.
This 'comparing to alcohol' bullshit pisses me off. Yes, alcohol is worse for you than weed. Yes it is hypocritical alcohol is legal. Does that mean weed should be legal? No.
Firstly let's take a look at alcohol. Now most people agree that if a new drug came to existence which had the exact same effects that alcohol has on us it would quickly become illegal. For sake of argument, lets say alcohol should be illegal. The negatives that come with it by it being legal by far outweigh the positives in society. The problem is, it would be impossible to make alcohol illegal. The public outcry would be too much. Alcohol is so widely accepted that there is no way it will become illegal.
Just because weed isn't as bad for you as alcohol this fact alone is no argument for legalization. You have to totally ignore this point. If weed should be legal you would have to objectively judge if it is better for society being legal than illegal which I think a lot of you members will think is the case.
An analogy would be if beating women was illegal but molesting little kids was legal and somehow it is be impossible to change this law about molestation. This warrants no argument to legalize beating women. You have to judge if beating women should be illegal independently.
This may be an obvious point for some but I hear this argument for legalizing weed too many times.