Sophie wrote:Sure let's make it all legal
They should stop making em. Obviously that's not gonna happen though. But no. Bullshit that they should be made legal imo.
Your sarcasm is misplaced, Sophie.
That's ok, it's not like I don't understand your view. However, your view is no doubt based on your perception of drugs themselves. Drugs are bad? Okay, that's fine. But the issue is this: what's the best way to deal with the drug issue? In theory, it was prohibition. However, prohibition in practice has been a massive failure, with more harm than good done to the citizens of the countries that utilize this practice.
So...what
has been shown to work? Legalization, and the health-based approach to drug regulation. Amsterdam is the best example we have for marijuana being legal for recreational use. What has that shown us? Well, percentage-wise, there are lower usage rates than here in the United States. There is obviously less drug-related crime, and people aren't being thrown in prison for essentially a victimless crime.
What about other drugs, though? In the UK, and I believe even Canada, there are heroin clinics. Addicts go to these clinics, and are able to receive their drugs for free in a sanitary setting. If the addicts can't afford to pay for the drugs, they are provided free of charge, up to three times a day. Surely, with one of the hardest drugs, there are grave consequences, right?
Compared to prohibition, no. Heroin use in these countries is lower than in the United States. Transmission of HIV from dirty needles has dropped, and crime is no longer funded by heroin sales--because the dealers can't compete with "free". Users are able to function like normal people, hold jobs, own houses, and raise families. Their use is supervised by health practitioners, and rehabilitation is always an option for them, when they are ready. In practice, health-based approaches work far better than out-right prohibition.
In Portugal, it wasn't too long ago that they decriminalized simple possession of
all drugs and drug paraphernalia. The United States government frantically warned of drug tourism, and drug addiction consuming the country. What happened? Not much at all. Usage didn't show a significant rise (if any at all) and the big difference is now there aren't a bunch of people in prison for a victimless crime. Decriminalization is good, but it doesn't take the business away from criminal enterprise, which is still being targeted by police.
So what's the point of all of this? Prohibition is less effective. Sure, you may not want people doing drugs, but the more effective solution is regulation. In the United States, we have 5% of the world population, and 25% of the world's prison population.
We have more people in prison for drug charges than all of western Europe has in prison for anything--and they have more people than us. That's a disgrace.
While I don't think people should abuse drugs, I recognize that the facts point towards regulation as the best option--and I think anyone that will have taken the time to read this long (looong) post will have to agree: it's just the facts.
Thank you.