just a question bout this vet stuff

[mcZu]

Cause' it's worthless to reward people who are no longer active. That's like giving a president a nobel peace prize and he sends more soldiers to afganistan.

Naah, it's more like a vietnam vet getting a reward and then taken away from him 'cause he stopped attending vet meetings.

Nope, the vets in here aint get shot up, they posted text on a forum. Unjustified glorious metaphors will not work to support your case.

Neither does

That's like giving a president a nobel peace prize and he sends more soldiers to afganistan.

[MC Anonymous]

Naah, it's more like a vietnam vet getting a reward and then taken away from him 'cause he stopped attending vet meetings.

Nope, the vets in here aint get shot up, they posted text on a forum. Unjustified glorious metaphors will not work to support your case.

Neither does

That's like giving a president a nobel peace prize and he sends more soldiers to afganistan.

At least my statement had some validity to it, unlike yours.

[mcZu]

Nope, the vets in here aint get shot up, they posted text on a forum. Unjustified glorious metaphors will not work to support your case.

Neither does

That's like giving a president a nobel peace prize and he sends more soldiers to afganistan.

At least my statement had some validity to it, unlike yours.

Elaborate on that my dear friend.

[*MIRANDA*]

ur in denial

touch my other head

smh -_-
i might just cut it off if u keep this up

Cause' it's worthless to reward people who are no longer active. That's like giving a president a nobel peace prize and he sends more soldiers to afganistan.

Naah, it's more like a vietnam vet getting a reward and then taken away from him 'cause he stopped attending vet meetings.

Nope, the vets in here aint get shot up, they posted text on a forum. Unjustified glorious metaphors will not work to support your case.

i just dont see why vets need the coler of theyre names changed
theyre still known on this forum,
and lots of the older vets where very frequint posters that kept tr alive
long before sum of these new vet nominees even joined.. so they def contributed allot
juz doesnt make sense.. once upon a time they where vets and with a reason so why not just keep there name blue so we can remember them
not like theres a certain amount of blue names that are allowed on this site
so aslong as new peeps are made vet i dotn see why older vets need to be unvetted

[MC Anonymous]

That's like giving a president a nobel peace prize and he sends more soldiers to afganistan.

At least my statement had some validity to it, unlike yours.

Elaborate on that my dear friend.[/quote]

It's simple, my metaphor had relevance to the subject in showing the worthlessness of vet. people who are inactive. Inactive meaning not doing anything to deserve it, which brings me to the Obama reference.

[mcZu]

At least my statement had some validity to it, unlike yours.

Elaborate on that my dear friend.

It's simple, my metaphor had relevance to the subject in showing the worthlessness of vet. people who are inactive. Inactive meaning not doing anything to deserve it, which brings me to the Obama reference.

Obama is still active, it isn't like he stopped being a president

And Miranda is right. It doesn't matter.

[*MIRANDA*]

people who are inactive. Inactive meaning not doing anything to deserve it,

i get what ur saying
but these people dont need todo anything forrit
like ASP is a administrator
and he hardly has been on for more then a year and a half now
and he actually has a job of keeping shit in order
but tr Vets are just people that earned theyre status cuz they helped the site at one point.. so why take it away..
ya get me ?

[MC Anonymous]

And Miranda is right. It doesn't matter.

It does matter in the scheme of things, they don't deserve what they have, therefore the privilege must be taken away. Also, about the inactive thing, he didn't deserve the Nobel Peace Prize, therefore he doesn't deserve the privilege

[mcZu]

And Miranda is right. It doesn't matter.

It does matter in the scheme of things, they don't deserve what they have, therefore the privilege must be taken away. Also, about the inactive thing, he didn't deserve the Nobel Peace Prize, therefore he doesn't deserve the privilege

So, following that logic, everything you own that you don't deserve should be taken away?

[MC Anonymous]

And Miranda is right. It doesn't matter.

It does matter in the scheme of things, they don't deserve what they have, therefore the privilege must be taken away. Also, about the inactive thing, he didn't deserve the Nobel Peace Prize, therefore he doesn't deserve the privilege

So, following that logic, everything you own that you don't deserve should be taken away?

..... You win LOL

[mcZu]

It does matter in the scheme of things, they don't deserve what they have, therefore the privilege must be taken away. Also, about the inactive thing, he didn't deserve the Nobel Peace Prize, therefore he doesn't deserve the privilege

So, following that logic, everything you own that you don't deserve should be taken away?

..... You win LOL

You put up a good fight.

[macdaddy019967]

smh -_-
i might just cut it off if u keep this up

ok ok i will buy you dinner first

[*MIRANDA*]

no thnx

[EminemIVLife]

why do all these peeps keep making lists of people that need to be "un-vetted"
why unvet them ? they where vet for a reason back then
and they will always be special members to the history of tr
even if we get new vets, what is it to you guys it theyre names stay blue ?.. its not bothering noone
i was juz wondering ..

Cause' it's worthless to reward people who are no longer active. That's like giving a president a nobel peace prize and he sends more soldiers to afganistan.

[Sophie]

Surely you can keep the other people vets and still make new people vets? Or is there only a certain number of vets you can do?