shouldnt this be in sports?
well anyway.. i kno its not right but
NCAA Basketball - UCLA
NCAA Football - USC
:]

Chino562 wrote:shouldnt this be in sports?
well anyway.. i kno its not right but
NCAA Basketball - UCLA
NCAA Football - USC
:]

Chino562 wrote:shouldnt this be in sports?
well anyway.. i kno its not right but
NCAA Basketball - UCLA
NCAA Football - USC
:]

gladimnotsoluble wrote:slimthps wrote:Big 12 > SEC
This year he's absolutely correct.
The SEC is pretty lousy this year.
And Tash is right, I think USC could dominate any of the top 5 teams including Alabama or Teebow's fucking Gators. Their defense would stifle 'Bama, Texas, OU, or Florida.



XXStiiCCyXX wrote:gladimnotsoluble wrote:slimthps wrote:Big 12 > SEC
This year he's absolutely correct.
The SEC is pretty lousy this year.
And Tash is right, I think USC could dominate any of the top 5 teams including Alabama or Teebow's fucking Gators. Their defense would stifle 'Bama, Texas, OU, or Florida.
Big 12 = great offence and zero defence...







XXStiiCCyXX wrote:gladimnotsoluble wrote:slimthps wrote:Big 12 > SEC
This year he's absolutely correct.
The SEC is pretty lousy this year.
And Tash is right, I think USC could dominate any of the top 5 teams including Alabama or Teebow's fucking Gators. Their defense would stifle 'Bama, Texas, OU, or Florida.
Big 12 = great offence and zero defence...
and how can you say USC can dominate anyone in the top 5 when they cant even beat people in there own conference...and let's face it the Pac 10 is HORRIBLE!!
Chino562 wrote:well not my fault that usc is horrible in bball and ucla in football

USC lost to Oregon St., who up until last week was going to the Rose Bowl. USC also spanked an Ohio State team who was at the time ranked 5th in the nation, and is now 10th in the nation. The Pac 10 obviously is not up at the level the Big 12 is performing at, and they are not a great conference, but you can hardly call them absolutely horrible. Oregon, Cal, Oregon State are all formidable rivals, no doubt Washington and Washington St. are straight trash, but to call the Pac 10 horrible is a misstatement.
The SEC has Auburn, Arkansas, LSU, Mississippi St., Kentucky, South Carolina, who are all pretty atrocious teams themselves.
Your west coast bias is ridiculous, and I believe USC could play and beat anyone in the top 5.




gladimnotsoluble wrote:^ k because we're TOTALLY talking about historically. Everyone understands historically the SEC balls ass. For gods sakes historically the Big 12 isn't even that great.
WE'RE talking about THIS year. THIS year, Oregon State was on a run to the rose bowl. THIS year Oregon is ranked 19th in the country. THIS year, Cal's team is pretty tough. THIS year USC could take on and beat any of the top 5 teams.
gg



XXStiiCCyXX wrote:gladimnotsoluble wrote:^ k because we're TOTALLY talking about historically. Everyone understands historically the SEC balls ass. For gods sakes historically the Big 12 isn't even that great.
WE'RE talking about THIS year. THIS year, Oregon State was on a run to the rose bowl. THIS year Oregon is ranked 19th in the country. THIS year, Cal's team is pretty tough. THIS year USC could take on and beat any of the top 5 teams.
gg
Well THIS year, the Pac-10 is the laughing stock of college football. Ive seen some the games this year and it's hilarious of how bad the play is...
Give me 1 fucking reason why i should believe USC could beat any of top 5 after they lost to Oregon State?...oh and don't tell me there defence because believe me a division 2 school could have a good defence in that conference

gladimnotsoluble wrote:James R. wrote:I don't see too many of the Top 5 teams getting ass fucked by stupid ass schools like Stanford though
Because last year when HOW many number 2 teams lost? didn't tell you anything about upsets?
Stanford isn't a stupid ass school, and USC didn't get ass fucked.


Users browsing this forum: No registered users