mcZu wrote:I actually enjoyed it, tbh. It was nothing too special, though, but I didn't expect that much from it anyway. A few tracks were meh, but I enjoyed the majority of the EP.
Do you think it's better than Recovery or Relapse? Or both?
mcZu wrote:I actually enjoyed it, tbh. It was nothing too special, though, but I didn't expect that much from it anyway. A few tracks were meh, but I enjoyed the majority of the EP.
xxTrigger1989xx wrote:mcZu wrote:I actually enjoyed it, tbh. It was nothing too special, though, but I didn't expect that much from it anyway. A few tracks were meh, but I enjoyed the majority of the EP.
Do you think it's better than Recovery or Relapse? Or both?
Revolutionary wrote:mcZu wrote:Revolutionary wrote:It's funny that they said that when last year without him, music business would have died.
Let them haters hate, Shady stays winning.
Lol, please tell me you're not serious....
Well, obviously not.
But Em repaired a lotta damage in the music business last year.
If you don't believe me, go read on it.
Last year was one of the most horrible years in sales (Albums) and it would have ended up a disaster without Em & Taylor, FACT.
mcZu wrote:xxTrigger1989xx wrote:mcZu wrote:I actually enjoyed it, tbh. It was nothing too special, though, but I didn't expect that much from it anyway. A few tracks were meh, but I enjoyed the majority of the EP.
Do you think it's better than Recovery or Relapse? Or both?
It's not that easy to compare, because an EP isn't an album. However, if we talk about pure content, I'd say it's better than Recovery--although Recovery has a better message--due to the step up in lyricality.
Relapse had the better rhyming, and it would've been much better without the accents. If I had to choose, I'd probably go with the HTS, just 'cause I enjoyed listening to it more than I did listening to Recovery and Relapse.
I do think that Recovery and Relapse have the better songs, though, but as a whole, HTS is slightly more enjoyable to me than Recovery and Relapse.
My opinion might change after a while, though.
stillmatic wrote:Lol @ these dudes praising Katy Perry. I mean ffs.
She doesn't write her own music and is a frequent collaborator with the usual crap of producers who make all the pop hits.
At the very least, as crap as Gaga is, she DOES write her own music, she DOES have her own producers and doesn't collab much with the Dr.Luke's or Max Martins of the pop genre who the likes of Katy Perry, Britney, Kesha run to when they need a hit.
Gaga will still be here in 10 years time. By that time the likes of Katy Perry and Kesha would have been replaced by the new pop sensations.
Oh and Katy Perry is UGLY as fuck.
Scrubz wrote:
"Except for covers and when she's featured in songs Katy perry at least co-writes everything she sings and does write the music and lyrics for her songs. On the One of the Boys album she wrote music and lyrics for 3 songs (thinking of you, mannequin and one of the Boys) and cowrote the other 9."
do your research first you fuck tard.
And for the record lady gaga writes less music than the likes of perry and kesha. Kesha was a song writer before a pop star.
Geno wrote:lol @ you judging Katy Perry by her singles. That's like looking at Eminem with Just Lose It and We Made You.![]()
But I'm gonna hold off arguing about pop stars 'cause it'll go way off topic.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users