by Eedee » Jan 29th, '13, 18:21
UofLCardFan08 wrote:Eedee wrote:Won't Back Down: This song either grows on you or it doesn't. People say the beat is jumbled
I never really understood that criticism. The hard beat fits well with his delivery.
mdemaz wrote:dam
by Eedee » Jan 29th, '13, 18:26
PAINKILLƎR wrote:Ughh this thread...
mdemaz wrote:dam
by PAINKILLƎR » Jan 29th, '13, 18:27
Eedee wrote:PAINKILLƎR wrote:Ughh this thread...
Oh hell nah boy.
I'm kidding, this album is gr8by Just Silver » Jan 29th, '13, 19:20
by Eedee » Jan 29th, '13, 19:28
Revolutionary wrote:Nvgt wrote:And 3 years later they'd go back and re-rate it.
He's not re-rating it you idiot, he loved it from the get go.
And i'm with dR3 on You're Never Over, it's just too corny.
mdemaz wrote:dam
by PAINKILLƎR » Jan 29th, '13, 19:30
Eedee wrote:Anyone thinking a Stan Part 2?
by SoldierShady » Jan 29th, '13, 20:24
Eedee wrote:^ Lol...
I never said I was the first, nor did I act like it. I'm merely saying this thread isn't deserving of being thrown into the category of "these types of threads".
If you don't want to join in the discussion on topic, then don't post in here, please.
He's 'bout to pull out an invisible gat and shoot me in the back right now. 
by ShadyxEminem » Jan 29th, '13, 23:22
Eedee wrote:Anyone thinking a Stan Part 2?
by Eedee » Jan 30th, '13, 01:39
ShadyxEminem wrote:Eedee wrote:Anyone thinking a Stan Part 2?
No.
mdemaz wrote:dam
by PAINKILLƎR » Jan 30th, '13, 01:47
Eedee wrote:ShadyxEminem wrote:Eedee wrote:Anyone thinking a Stan Part 2?
No.
Why not? A prequel/sequel to it would be interesting.
PAINKILLƎR wrote:Eedee wrote:Anyone thinking a Stan Part 2?
I'll roll you over with a boulder if you ever ask this again.
But other than that great review
by Eedee » Jan 30th, '13, 01:48
mdemaz wrote:dam
by PAINKILLƎR » Jan 30th, '13, 01:53
Eedee wrote:^ so... no rebuttal?
by Eedee » Jan 30th, '13, 01:55
PAINKILLƎR wrote:Eedee wrote:^ so... no rebuttal?
If there were to be a sequel or prequel it will take away from the original song if it were to fail and suck. Then it will make (imo) Stan no longer a classic. You can't follow up a song of that stature. Move on from the possibility please.
mdemaz wrote:dam
by PAINKILLƎR » Jan 30th, '13, 01:57
Eedee wrote:PAINKILLƎR wrote:Eedee wrote:^ so... no rebuttal?
If there were to be a sequel or prequel it will take away from the original song if it were to fail and suck. Then it will make (imo) Stan no longer a classic. You can't follow up a song of that stature. Move on from the possibility please.
I don't agree with that statement... He's proved he can sequel/prequel his own songs.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot]
