Menzo wrote:There are a ton of examples of good rhyming on Recovery like on "On Fire", "Cold Wind Blows", "No Love" and "Ridaz"...actually the entire album is full of examples of good rhyming, is it as obvious and in your face as Relapse? No, why? Because his rhyming on Recovery started to diversify and become more complex..
I think you're missing the point of the vast majority of the rhyming on Relapse. It isn't just there to show technical skill; it's there to assist his flow. By stringing together what you call a mixture of 'obvious rhymes', each line flows perfectly into the next. This isn't true with the majority of the tracks on Recovery; whilst the rhymes, as you argue, are more diverse, they're random, appear in chunks for brief bursts before being followed by parts of the verse which are relatively rhymeless before the listener is hit by another shot of rhyming again. It's almost excessive; and whilst it is interesting to listen to, to me it doesn't highlight good rhyming. Good rhyming should be, in my opinion, consistent whilst allowing the verse to evolve. Lose Yourself or TIC are perhaps the best examples of this. When the rhyme scheme changes it is almost unnoticeable because of the way Em maintains a consistent evolution of rhyming. This is where Relapse excels over Recovery; the consistency shows that Em has the skill to maintain complex rhyming without compromising on flow or lyricism.
I know you will probably try and argue against this, but I think it is pretty axiomatic really. I'm not hating on Recovery by any means, but I think it's pretty bold to argue that Recovery shows better rhyming skills than Relapse.