djdixie wrote:because shes extra pop, where would it end
rihanna then she is also not far behind
djdixie wrote:because shes extra pop, where would it end






Trimss wrote:I would love it. But not some California Girls shit.. She can sing good and emotional hooks.








Revtone wrote:
With this bitch?![]()
![]()








djdixie wrote: i say bring back dina and keep skylar aswell. bin the rest lol
and let's not forget Hayley williams 






MCSam wrote:lol he can work with pink ,rihhana,sg and hayley.w then why not Katy


Sla wrote:Because Katy Perry does trashier music. "I Kissed A Girl", "California Girls" may sound nice, but come on, that are really insignificant songs. Rihanna got a more serious image, even if someone might lough now. She got more credibility, street credibility. The young generations identificate more with her. She's a rebell, she's cool. She's got some ghetto touch. Look at all her scandals. Compared to her Katy Perry is the girl next door, the daughter of a pastor/priest or whatever. Talking bullshit, making morals. Katy Perry will never ever be on Rihanna's level.







flyingmonkey10 wrote:Sla wrote:Because Katy Perry does trashier music. "I Kissed A Girl", "California Girls" may sound nice, but come on, that are really insignificant songs. Rihanna got a more serious image, even if someone might lough now. She got more credibility, street credibility. The young generations identificate more with her. She's a rebell, she's cool. She's got some ghetto touch. Look at all her scandals. Compared to her Katy Perry is the girl next door, the daughter of a pastor/priest or whatever. Talking bullshit, making morals. Katy Perry will never ever be on Rihanna's level.
you forgot to mention she's an illuminati bitch





Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot]