richard wrote:Aiming for a song to be big and aiming for it to appeal to as many people as possible are the same thing...that's how songs get big. I also think this whole thing about pop music not being offensive at all. Sure Eminem is more over the top than other artists but take Katy Perry for example, in a song entitled Teenage Dream (stress the TEENAGE) the lyrics are "Let's go all the way tonight, no regrets, just love." Many parents did take offense to these lyrics and the glorification of being a whore - and this was a number one single.
No it's not, at all.
Because pop songs are geared to just appeal to any and everybody, as many as possible. No bias, no worries who likes it or why or any of that.
Where as, Eminem could of wanted "Stan" to be big, I'm sure he did. But would you that is a pop song? or in any way comparable to a pop artist writing a hit to be big. It's an artistic, storytelling track. But he could of still very well wanted it to be big and legendary.
I'm sure he wanted "Lose Yourself" to be big. But he didn't aim it to appeal to as many as possible as it's intelligent and poetic. And intelligence is a minority. He aimed for it to be big through execution and quality, not by watering it down to offend as little as possible.
There's a massive difference between the two, and a massive difference between Eminem or a true artist aiming or wanting a CREATION and idea to be big and provocative, and a pop artist aiming for... a jingle, to be a big
hit.
richard wrote:A lot of his best songs were singles. Lose Yourself, Stan, Sing For The Moment. Of course this is opinion but these are also widely regarded as among his best.
I'm mainly talking first singles. It's only really the lead single that he ever needed to push the album. "Stan" didn't fare well on the charts, "Lose Yourself" was gigantic but largely due to the movie but it's also just a perfect marriage of... you see, for a song to be a hit it doesn't have to be pop.
"Lose Yourself" is one of the greatest hip hop songs ever written period. In any sense. Technically, and the beat is pure hip hop. Yet it's a massive, massive hit. That doesn't make it pop though. That song is in no way pop. It's poetic, thoughtful, meaningful, spirited.
Just because something is big or gets big doesn't make it pop music.
Those other songs were clearly made as songs then put out as singles, and yes, they're some of his best but essentially album material. They're not written to be singles. Again, the guy who wrote "Sing for the Moment"... a pop artist? not a chance. He's more rock than pop.
You could way more easily argue his rock crossover, as he has lots of rock elements and rock attitude in his music. He has no pop attitude though and nothing he does as an artist, is pop. Pop by its very nature is safe, he's the opposite of that. Just because he makes catchy music... basically all his music is catchy, even songs about raping women.
His songs are catchy because he's a good musician and has an ear for melody. And knows how to make a good song. But pop doesn't hold the monopoly on catchy.
richard wrote:Our Eminem album elimination game seems to suggest otherwise...though I agree there are better songs than his singles on his albums, the singles are definitely not the worst.
Lead singles.
"My Name Is" is easily the worst song on The Slim Shady LP to me.
I think "The Real Slim Shady" is a classic hip hop track but one of the worst on the album. Not thee worst maybe... I can't figure out wish, they're all pretty classic.
"Without Me" is one of the best, but almost every track on TES is amazing.
"Just Lose It" is easily the worst on the album and worst song he's ever made to me.
"We Made You" is one of the worst on Relapse. Though not actually a bad song to me. But, yeah, definitely one of the worst.
And, didn't you say you thought "Not Afraid" was cheesy and you didn't particularly like it? so... actually, in this elimination game, it seems they are usually the worst.
Even when his lead singles are good like "Without Me", it's a song written to be a single. It's a concise, summary version of Eminem, not a true Eminem song. It's a song where he's being entertaining to grab attention, it's certainly not his best lyrical content.
I think it'd be daft to say his lead singles are his best material. And that's all I'm really talking about. As with Em they usually just make sure he has one lead single. Then they put out the catchiest or least offensive material, or songs with the biggest hooks as the next.
richard wrote:'Cold Wind Blows' is the rawest song on the album, so no argument there. I think that hook for 'Not Afraid' is very cheesy and watered down. "We'll walk this road together, through the storm, whatever weather, cold or warm..."Cheesy, been-done-before, cliche even. Not to mention it's over the minor6-4-1-5 chord progression - the most popular chord progression in pop hits. I know he didn't produce the track, but this is HIS album and thus HIS art. This is an EMINEM song, very few people perceive this song as Boi-1da's project. And for that I believe that yes, he wrote a pop song.
No, he didn't write a pop song. The chorus is watered down for the sake of a message, it's corny but Em has always usually been corny when trying to be deadly serious or convey this kind of thing. Motivation by its nature is usually corny.
But the lyrical content in the song is not watered down. No pop artist would write a song dissecting their own character flaws so bluntly and brutally, addressing fans like an open letter... it's the song of a songwriter. Cheesy or not, it's not pop. It's just cheesy rap.
He says fuck the world in it, he's still a rebellion in it. He's not toning himself down at ALL. He's more explicit than usual in the first verse, defiant for the sake of it.
The lyrical content and therefore the song, to me, is not pop. As hip hop is a largely lyrical genre, the focus is on the lyrics. So if the lyrics aren't pop, the song isn't pop. And none of Eminem's lyrics have ever been pop. If they had been, I'd of noticed it and I'd be pissed off about it. He's been cheesy, he''s been lazy, he's been unfunny. But
never pop.
richard wrote:I think it can be said that although he doesn't hate Relapse, it didn't live up to his expecations and thus birthed Recovery. He mentioned disappointment in not being included on MTV's hottest MCs list - now I know this is pertinent to hip hop and not pop, but if you look at how the list is actually judged, it is very much based on that pop music criteria. It's also undeniable that the rapping on Relapse is technically superior to that of Recovery, with some exceptions such as 'Beautiful' from Relapse and 'On Fire' from Recovery.
I don't think it has anything to do with expectations. I just think it's because it got a mixed critical and fan reaction and he couldn't handle it.
I think he sold himself short and compromised with
Recovery. But not for the sake of money or fame, not for pop reasons. I don't think he gives a shit about that. The fact he appeals to fans in his first single speaks volumes.
I think he just thought he alienated fans and could fuck up his entire career in one foul swoop if he put Relapse 2 out. So he changed his style. And I think that's largely the reason for the lyrical drop too, not to mention the subject-matter. As many have said, it's easier to rhyme about endless violence (descriptive by nature) than it is about trials and tribulations. In such detail.
But
Recovery still has some incredible lyricism. And I think it's absurd to call it a pop album given how relentless and hardcore 90% of it is. I mean... "Cold Wind Blows" and "Almost Famous" are two of his angriest, most blatantly and pointlessly offensive and aggressive tracks ever. And pop is not aggressive and relentless. As aggressive isn't a surefire appeal.
So there's just no way to justify the rapper on those tracks as pop.
And you can take any track on the album and he's lyrical, tongue-in-cheek, jokingly petulant, self-analytical. All the things he always is. The only difference is his style, which he changes every single album anyway. I just think he didn't want to look out of touch, or like a has-been.
richard wrote:And this is why I believe Eminem is somewhat of a pop artist. A hip hop genius first and foremost, but has released some songs with many pop elements which could justifiably be classified as pop music, thus making him a pop artist even if only to a very limited extent.
No, working with a pop artist, does not make you a pop artist.
His songs have had pop elements when he's worked with a pop artist. They need to work pop elements into the music to make the pop artist sound natural.
None of his solo songs are pop at all. And I've never heard a single pop performance from him as an artist. Always himself, always honest, always relentless, always uncensored. Look at how many rappers work with RnB and soul artists. That doesn't make them RnB or soul artists though. It just makes them rappers who have happened to work with RnB and soul artists.
Kanye West has worked fucking... techno and classical music into his music for god's sake. Is Kanye West a classical musician now too?
richard wrote:Pop music can have all of these things too...it just needs to have that sound to it.
No it can't. Pop is not just a sound in the same way hip hop isn't.
It's themes and styles and content.
None of Eminem's approach to themes and content can be classified as pop. And no pop ever approaches themes and content like Eminem does. Pop can touch on war, politics and all kinds of uncomfortable issues. But it does it in a safe, child-friendly, inoffensive way.
Given how totally unorthodox, in your face, ballsy, edgy and confrontation Eminem is as an artist, he as an artist, can never ever ever be called pop. It's the opposite. If you're going to call Eminem pop, you may as well throw the definition out the window and make up a new word.