The TRshady Forum became read-only in December 2014. The 10 year history will live on, in this archive.
Continue the discussion with the new home for the Eminem and Hip Hop discussion: HipHopShelter.com.

Regarding Relapse conspiracy theories on here

All questions and discussions on Eminem to be found here.

Re: Regarding Relapse conspiracy theories on here

Postby Jimmy Conway » May 7th, '13, 23:43

I thought I posted in this thread. Maybe I missed it or just imagined it.

Label pressure resulted in Recovery. The features, label pressure. ALL of it. Relapse was dark, not as mainstream. They needed the opposite.

It amazes me how much control people around Em has on him. They need him a lot more than he needs them. A lot of negative things on Eminem's albums have been caused by the label.

But I get it, without them, he would be flipping burgers in Detroit. But, I wish they would just leave him 100% alone and let him do what he wants.

That's how FX does with Louis CK. They have no input in the show at all. And it's a great show.
It's the body bag game bitch I'm supplying coffins
User avatar
Jimmy Conway
Renegade
Renegade
 
Posts: 2018
Joined: Apr 20th, '10, 21:35

Re: Regarding Relapse conspiracy theories on here

Postby BlueberryWun » May 7th, '13, 23:47

Slim Cary wrote:I thought I posted in this thread. Maybe I missed it or just imagined it.

Label pressure resulted in Recovery. The features, label pressure. ALL of it. Relapse was dark, not as mainstream. They needed the opposite.

It amazes me how much control people around Em has on him. They need him a lot more than he needs them. A lot of negative things on Eminem's albums have been caused by the label.

But I get it, without them, he would be flipping burgers in Detroit. But, I wish they would just leave him 100% alone and let him do what he wants.

That's how FX does with Louis CK. They have no input in the show at all. And it's a great show.



You missed the main point fam? Relapse has sold 5 milion worldwide made Interscope and everyone concerned a hell of alotta profit to where they laughing all the way to the bank. Not only did it sell 5 million worldwide it sold over 600K first week. What you saying is nonsense you can't ignore the facts that it sold multi platinum and the label just cares about profit and with RElapse they got hella profit
Image



MURDER, MURDER YOUNG G STRAPPED WITH HIS BURNER BURNER
User avatar
BlueberryWun
Soldier
Soldier
 
Posts: 742
Joined: May 1st, '13, 16:37
Location: Heathside

Re: Regarding Relapse conspiracy theories on here

Postby Jimmy Conway » May 7th, '13, 23:57

BlueberryWun wrote:
Slim Cary wrote:I thought I posted in this thread. Maybe I missed it or just imagined it.

Label pressure resulted in Recovery. The features, label pressure. ALL of it. Relapse was dark, not as mainstream. They needed the opposite.

It amazes me how much control people around Em has on him. They need him a lot more than he needs them. A lot of negative things on Eminem's albums have been caused by the label.

But I get it, without them, he would be flipping burgers in Detroit. But, I wish they would just leave him 100% alone and let him do what he wants.

That's how FX does with Louis CK. They have no input in the show at all. And it's a great show.



What you saying is nonsense


irony
It's the body bag game bitch I'm supplying coffins
User avatar
Jimmy Conway
Renegade
Renegade
 
Posts: 2018
Joined: Apr 20th, '10, 21:35

Re: Regarding Relapse conspiracy theories on here

Postby BlueberryWun » May 8th, '13, 00:03

Slim Cary wrote:
BlueberryWun wrote:
Slim Cary wrote:I thought I posted in this thread. Maybe I missed it or just imagined it.

Label pressure resulted in Recovery. The features, label pressure. ALL of it. Relapse was dark, not as mainstream. They needed the opposite.

It amazes me how much control people around Em has on him. They need him a lot more than he needs them. A lot of negative things on Eminem's albums have been caused by the label.

But I get it, without them, he would be flipping burgers in Detroit. But, I wish they would just leave him 100% alone and let him do what he wants.

That's how FX does with Louis CK. They have no input in the show at all. And it's a great show.



What you saying is nonsense


irony


Well you da 1 ignoring the facts like Relapse having sold 5 million worldwide, over 600K opening week, having a number 1 single. Facts speak for them self that based on it's sales Interscope made hella money from it's sales
Image



MURDER, MURDER YOUNG G STRAPPED WITH HIS BURNER BURNER
User avatar
BlueberryWun
Soldier
Soldier
 
Posts: 742
Joined: May 1st, '13, 16:37
Location: Heathside

Re: Regarding Relapse conspiracy theories on here

Postby NeverSincerely » May 8th, '13, 02:54

Francesco wrote:I can't believe how ignorant, stupid & embarrassing that was for both of you.

How do you know you lost an argument? When you resort to insults. How can you call me ignorant when you're the who seems to be incapable of finding facts to back up your argument.

Francesco wrote:So you said the re-release didn't help much for the sales

No, go back and re-read my original post.

NeverSincerely wrote:The re-release didn't help AS MUCH AS YOU THINK for Relapse to reach 2million in sales. It reached the 2 million mark a month or so after the release of Recovery. Which would be over 7 months after the re-release, so you can't give the re-release ALL the credit for Relapse passing the 2 million mark.

Where did I say it didn't help much? Nowhere.
I know that English isn't your first language so I won't insult your lack of reading comprehension. What my bolded statement means is that "you think it helped Relapse reach 2 million in sales more than it actually did" it does not mean that I think it didn't help.

Francesco wrote:but then brought that piece of statistics yourself & didn't feel stupid about it. :facepalm I was talking about the numbers on top of my head obviously,...

Oh I see, the statics I brought that showed you clearly didn't know what you were talking about are stupid, yet the fact that more than half the numbers brought up were incorrect is perfectly fine.

Francesco wrote:...it wasn't about facts but it obviously shows the re-release helped a great deal & this was the pointWhy didn't you bring the week sales before the re release genius? I dare you to bring the few weeks before the re release. I promise we'll talk again about facts when you bring that!

Because it took me a long time to find and put together the week-to-week sales for Relapse. You might understand how much time and effort it took to do that if you ever bothered finding facts to back up your faulty arguments. Also, I didn't pull the numbers up because I didn't disagree with the amount you said it was selling before the re-release, only after.

Relapse 15,707 1,566,871
Relapse 10,610 1,551,164
Relapse 9,370 1,540,554
Relapse 10,686 1,531,184
Relapse 9,071 1,520,498
Relapse 9,150 1,511,427
Relapse 9,646 1,502,277
Relapse 8,920 1,492,631
Relapse 9.536 1,483,711

This goes from the top being the week before the re-release to the bottom being October 28th. While the re-release helped it's sales for a few weeks together with his Grammy performance, like I said before, you can't give it ALL the credit for Relapse hitting the 2 million mark. If we assume that the re-release is responsible for 250k-300k of Relapse's total sales to date(which I think is a fair estimate, but if you disagree please use actual facts and figures to prove why you think otherwise)I wouldn't say it helped a great deal, but it did help.

Francesco wrote:& bring Jay's & BEP's first week sales too!

Why don't YOU bring them. You are capable of doing that much right? Finding actual facts that didn't come "from the top of you head." Why would you need them anyway? You said they had lower first week sales, I never denied that. So what would finding the actual numbers prove exactly?

Francesco wrote:Do you realize they were desperate enough to put someone else's record on the album when they re-released it?
Do you realize there was no Relapse anymore when they re-released it with a new title & someone else's song plus whooping 6 new ones on it. :laughing:

As far as I am aware Relapse 2 was still the name at the time, but if you could bring the interview where they said otherwise I'll change my mind. Also I thought the 6 added songs were all from Relapse 2 and weren't made specifically for the purpose of being put on a re-release.

Francesco wrote: I'm gald you use statistics & shit but use your head as well. Here comes a fact that would make you sad... Refill could be easily a 7 songs EP on itself but they ridiculously made it a Relapse re-release exactly 'cuz they needed a boost in sales 'cuz Relapse was stuck on 1.7 mills & that is ridiculously low for an Em solo album. This thing alone rapes your theory... as a FACT so just beat it.

Yes it could have been an EP, like many other re-releases. You seemed to have skimmed over the part where I said that numerous successful albums get re-releases as well. Relapse wasn't "stuck" on any number. An album is considered stuck or stagnant when it falls off the billboard 200/catalouge charts completely like Relapse is now. To say Relapse is stuck at 2.3 million now would be a correct statement, to say it was stuck at 1.7 mill (I think you might have meant 1.5 mill) before the re-release would be incorrect since it was still selling and still on the billboard 200 at the time.

Francesco wrote:Recovery sold twice the Relapse numbers & they didn't need to re-release it... talk about facts.

Recovery did not sell twice the amount of Relapse if we're going to talk about facts. Last time I checked twice the amount of 2.3 million is 4.6 million and Recovery has sold 4.4 million. Talk about "facts" when you can actually find and use them.

What is your point with this "fact" anyway. Numerous successful albums get re-releases and numerous others don't. Re-release does not equal flop or under performance, which I said in my previous post but it seems I've had to repeat my self a lot in this thread.

Francesco wrote:Did you even read the OP before you started with the ''facts''.

I did read the OP, while his numbers were wrong, but I did agree in my original post that commercial success is not the reason Relapse 2 was scrapped. Did you read past the first sentence of my original post before you started with your "facts"

Francesco wrote:I won't even comment on the sad & obsessed with me groupie who added to your post.

I won't even comment on your incessant need to put people down with insults and pull "facts" out of thin air with nothing to back them up.
Image
User avatar
NeverSincerely
Trailer Trash
Trailer Trash
 
Posts: 144
Joined: Nov 3rd, '12, 22:35
Gender: Female

Re: Regarding Relapse conspiracy theories on here

Postby TheVintage » May 8th, '13, 05:55

I don't know who decided to change the direction from Relapse 2 to Recovery, whether it was Em, label pressure, or both, but career wise, it was the right move. Recovery needed to happen.

Encore was universally panned, in part because Eminem Show was a more mature, focused Eminem, and Encore reverted back to immaturity, corny subject matter, etc for the most part. He had regressed as an artist when he should have continued showing growth.

He took a hiatus, and when he came back, he thought the album people wanted was a technical masterpiece, to prove he still had it. While that was great, and Relapse is probably the most technically/lyrically sound album in his catalog, and it's basically a How To Rhyme Handbook for up and coming emcees, the subject was a turn off for most people. It did well for several reasons, one of them being it was the first solo album from him in a while, but there's no doubting the numbers would have been better, and the reception would have been better, if the album had more relatable subject matter.

His flow was ridiculous on every song, the beats were top notch, and it was a concept album, I get all that--but Relapse 2 would have absolutely buried him commercially.

He would probably be more of a recluse than he is now if he went along and dropped Relapse 2. He would be in the Detox zone, unsure of what direction he'd want to take the new album, unsure of what sound he'd want it to have, etc.

Look at the critical and commercial reception to Recovery. It's as if that's his *real* comeback album.

I understand people weren't down with the lack of skits, the pop guests, the pop sounding beats. I understand all that, but it is still a very well rounded album. Songs about his life (GTC, T2M), motivational songs (Not Afraid, Cinderella Man), songs where he's just going off (CWB, Almost Famous, On Fire), songs that are funny/light hearted (WTP, So Bad). I mean it was a pretty well rounded album, in my opinion, and touched on broad topics that most people could relate to.

Eminem excels at a lot of things. From flow, to lyricism, to emotion, to painting vivid pictures, but he is at his best (commercially, and arguably, overall) when he makes motivational stuff or stuff that pumps people up. Anthems. Relatable music. Lose Yourself. Till I Collapse. Sing For The Moment.

That's what most people want to hear. Not raping and killing, with accents. I myself can appreciate Em and all the styles he's able to use, but just from a purely image standpoint, Recovery needed to happen. He needed something to get people back on board, because Relapse turned a few people off, regardless of how good his core fan base thinks it was.

If he makes another Recovery I'd be far from disappointed as I think Recovery showed the growth and maturity he should have shown after Eminem Show.

The man is 40 years old. He's been around for quite a while, and his catalog is filled with the serial killer/shock value/etc stuff if that's the Em you like. But now he needs to change. He can't be doing the same stuff at 40 that he was at 27.

His anthem stuff, the type of songs I mentioned earlier, are still limited in his overall body of work.

We have plenty of shock value tracks to last us. I think we need more mature stuff, more motivational stuff.

Just my opinion.
TheVintage
Closet Cleaner
Closet Cleaner
 
Posts: 4
Joined: May 8th, '13, 01:45

Re: Regarding Relapse conspiracy theories on here

Postby Whitefox » May 8th, '13, 09:44

BlueberryWun wrote:
Slim Cary wrote:I thought I posted in this thread. Maybe I missed it or just imagined it.

Label pressure resulted in Recovery. The features, label pressure. ALL of it. Relapse was dark, not as mainstream. They needed the opposite.

It amazes me how much control people around Em has on him. They need him a lot more than he needs them. A lot of negative things on Eminem's albums have been caused by the label.

But I get it, without them, he would be flipping burgers in Detroit. But, I wish they would just leave him 100% alone and let him do what he wants.

That's how FX does with Louis CK. They have no input in the show at all. And it's a great show.



You missed the main point fam? Relapse has sold 5 milion worldwide made Interscope and everyone concerned a hell of alotta profit to where they laughing all the way to the bank. Not only did it sell 5 million worldwide it sold over 600K first week. What you saying is nonsense you can't ignore the facts that it sold multi platinum and the label just cares about profit and with RElapse they got hella profit


You're acting like Relapse has sold 5 milion worldwide in five minutes lol.
#encorefam
User avatar
Whitefox
Soldier
Soldier
 
Posts: 1253
Joined: Jun 23rd, '12, 07:06
Location: Russia
Gender: Male

Re: Regarding Relapse conspiracy theories on here

Postby SliK » May 8th, '13, 09:51

NeverSincerely :wub:
SliK
Under The Influence
Under The Influence
 
Posts: 4980
Joined: Dec 17th, '09, 06:03

Re: Regarding Relapse conspiracy theories on here

Postby Francesco » May 8th, '13, 12:37

This is how you initially addressed the situation... lol

NeverSincerely wrote: The re-release didn't help as much as you think for Relapse to reach 2million in sales. It reached the 2 million mark a month or so after the release of Recovery. Which would be over 7 months after the re-release, so you can't give the re-release all the credit for Relapse passing the 2 million mark.


Then when I proved you wrong you got butthurt & started to twist it around but ironically your statistics proved my point right & yours wrong! lol Considering the statistics you brought it ROUGHLY sold (I didn't use a calculator so I'll risk not to be exactly accurate again) 270k in total for 9 weeks after it was re-released (considering the statistics it goes further than that but I stopped at 9 weeks 'cuz of the 9 weeks prior to the re-release info) & it ROUGHLY sold 90k for the last 9 weeks before the re-release (keep in mind it would've kept decreasing too). Now is the time when you have to feel like an idiot... you don't need to twist anything anymore. You wanted facts... here we go! The fact is... the re-release helped a great deal for the album to even reach 2 mills so don't embarrass yourself any further & just beat it! I never gave it ALL the credit but that doesn't change the fact or my point of view anyway.



NeverSincerely wrote:
Francesco wrote:I can't believe how ignorant, stupid & embarrassing that was for both of you.

How do you know you lost an argument? When you resort to insults. How can you call me ignorant when you're the who seems to be incapable of finding facts to back up your argument.

You definitely are ignorant... I brought statistics for years ago on top of my head & they were on point & proved the point of the argument but you said I didn't know shit 'cuz the statistics I brought on top of my head weren't exactly accurate. :facepalm Pathetic.


Ignorant & pathetic indeed... a lotta irony in it too!
I thought you lose an argument when somebody proves you wrong or generally when you argue the obvious! lol
By the way did I insult you? :unsure:

NeverSincerely wrote:
Francesco wrote:So you said the re-release didn't help much for the sales

No, go back and re-read my original post.


I did & brought it back in this post too... now it/you look even worse than it/you initially did! lol

NeverSincerely wrote:The re-release didn't help AS MUCH AS YOU THINK for Relapse to reach 2million in sales. It reached the 2 million mark a month or so after the release of Recovery. Which would be over 7 months after the re-release, so you can't give the re-release ALL the credit for Relapse passing the 2 million mark.


NeverSincerely wrote:Where did I say it didn't help much? Nowhere.
I know that English isn't your first language so I won't insult your lack of reading comprehension. What my bolded statement means is that "you think it helped Relapse reach 2 million in sales more than it actually did" it does not mean that I think it didn't help.


Pathetic... embarrassing too! :laughing: Plus you have to be really outta your mind not to see the re-release helped a great deal for the album to even reach 2 mill. I'm like... SERIOUSLY? I mean you should only cut the numbers of the 10-12 weeks after the re-release & then add the numbers it was doing before that for those 10-12 weeks & you'd easily know how much the re-release helped! Wtf... this shit is obivious.
English is not my first language & I don't act like my English is even good but it's all irrelevant anyway... I addressed the situation totally the right way. Insult all you want... don't worry about it.

NeverSincerely wrote:
Francesco wrote:but then brought that piece of statistics yourself & didn't feel stupid about it. :facepalm I was talking about the numbers on top of my head obviously,...

Oh I see, the statics I brought that showed you clearly didn't know what you were talking about are stupid, yet the fact that more than half the numbers brought up were incorrect is perfectly fine.


Pathetic & desperate! The stats I brought on top of my head were not exactly accurate but obviously on point... I said LIKE & OR SO which made it clear I couldn't be exactly accurate but obviously those stats were backing the obvious point I was making. Keep desperately twisting & turning but I don't see how that would prove your point.


NeverSincerely wrote:
Francesco wrote:...it wasn't about facts but it obviously shows the re-release helped a great deal & this was the pointWhy didn't you bring the week sales before the re release genius? I dare you to bring the few weeks before the re release. I promise we'll talk again about facts when you bring that!

Because it took me a long time to find and put together the week-to-week sales for Relapse. You might understand how much time and effort it took to do that if you ever bothered finding facts to back up your faulty arguments. Also, I didn't pull the numbers up because I didn't disagree with the amount you said it was selling before the re-release, only after.
Relapse 15,707 1,566,871
Relapse 10,610 1,551,164
Relapse 9,370 1,540,554
Relapse 10,686 1,531,184
Relapse 9,071 1,520,498
Relapse 9,150 1,511,427
Relapse 9,646 1,502,277
Relapse 8,920 1,492,631
Relapse 9.536 1,483,711
This goes from the top being the week before the re-release to the bottom being October 28th. While the re-release helped it's sales for a few weeks together with his Grammy performance, like I said before, you can't give it ALL the credit for Relapse hitting the 2 million mark. If we assume that the re-release is responsible for 250k-300k of Relapse's total sales to date(which I think is a fair estimate, but if you disagree please use actual facts and figures to prove why you think otherwise)I wouldn't say it helped a great deal, but it did help.


This is the first logical paragraph on your side from the beginning but unfortunately for you it proves my point right! Thank for the effort on bringing the stats though... I mean that!

NeverSincerely wrote:
Francesco wrote:& bring Jay's & BEP's first week sales too!

Why don't YOU bring them. You are capable of doing that much right? Finding actual facts that didn't come "from the top of you head." Why would you need them anyway? You said they had lower first week sales, I never denied that. So what would finding the actual numbers prove exactly?


Pathetic... you brought them the last time when you thought they're gonna make you look good. Ok I'll go on top of my head again, don't use it against me. lol Both Jay & BEP sold somewhere in between 300-350k first week (probably not exactly accurate but who cares) while Relapse ROUGHLY doubled that. Relapse obviously stalled & my point was albums that started way slower caught/passed it on the way.

NeverSincerely wrote:
Francesco wrote:Do you realize they were desperate enough to put someone else's record on the album when they re-released it?
Do you realize there was no Relapse anymore when they re-released it with a new title & someone else's song plus whooping 6 new ones on it. :laughing:

As far as I am aware Relapse 2 was still the name at the time, but if you could bring the interview where they said otherwise I'll change my mind. Also I thought the 6 added songs were all from Relapse 2 and weren't made specifically for the purpose of being put on a re-release.


Exactly... lol They were definitely for Relapse 2 & but were put on a Relapse as a re-release exactly 'cuz the album needed a boost in sales. Again... there was someone else's song plus too many songs for a re-release anyway which is totally unusual esp. for Eminem!


NeverSincerely wrote:
Francesco wrote: I'm gald you use statistics & shit but use your head as well. Here comes a fact that would make you sad... Refill could be easily a 7 songs EP on itself but they ridiculously made it a Relapse re-release exactly 'cuz they needed a boost in sales 'cuz Relapse was stuck on 1.7 mills & that is ridiculously low for an Em solo album. This thing alone rapes your theory... as a FACT so just beat it.

Yes it could have been an EP, like many other re-releases. You seemed to have skimmed over the part where I said that numerous successful albums get re-releases as well. Relapse wasn't "stuck" on any number. An album is considered stuck or stagnant when it falls off the billboard 200/catalouge charts completely like Relapse is now. To say Relapse is stuck at 2.3 million now would be a correct statement, to say it was stuck at 1.7 mill (I think you might have meant 1.5 mill) before the re-release would be incorrect since it was still selling and still on the billboard 200 at the time.


I skimmed over that part for sure but only 'cuz it was ridiculous! I don't care who re-releases their albums 'cuz we were/are talking about Eminem & he didn't re-release any other album but Relapse!
I can't even believe you still arguing that the album was only re-released 'cuz of the reaction of the fans. Encore got shit storm from fans & reviewers but it obviously sold very good so even that album wasn't re-released.


NeverSincerely wrote:
Francesco wrote:Recovery sold twice the Relapse numbers & they didn't need to re-release it... talk about facts.

Recovery did not sell twice the amount of Relapse if we're going to talk about facts. Last time I checked twice the amount of 2.3 million is 4.6 million and Recovery has sold 4.4 million. Talk about "facts" when you can actually find and use them.
What is your point with this "fact" anyway. Numerous successful albums get re-releases and numerous others don't. Re-release does not equal flop or under performance, which I said in my previous post but it seems I've had to repeat my self a lot in this thread.


:laughing: Desperation is getting into you big time now! This is your lowest point so far!
Ironically you calculating/bringing statistics didn't work your way again. Cut the number Relapse did after the re-release & put both albums against each other again!
I wonder why you keep repeating yourself too. I thought we're talking about Eminem... so you better stick to him & don't talk about re-releases in general. I brought Recovery 'cuz it was the proof what they were looking for if we talk about EM sales.


NeverSincerely wrote:
Francesco wrote:Did you even read the OP before you started with the ''facts''.

I did read the OP, while his numbers were wrong, but I did agree in my original post that commercial success is not the reason Relapse 2 was scrapped. Did you read past the first sentence of my original post before you started with your "facts"


I did & it was all BS like I originally responded! I just proved you wrong again. That's it & that's all.
By the way the dude who made this thread has good hip-hop knowledge but he just wasn't on point this time around while you only dig into statistics while your knowledge is kinda basic.


NeverSincerely wrote:
Francesco wrote:I won't even comment on the sad & obsessed with me groupie who added to your post.

I won't even comment on your incessant need to put people down with insults and pull "facts" out of thin air with nothing to back them up.


Ignorant & ironic.... I never randomly insult people. As a matter a fact I probably do it the least on the forum & ironically the groupie you're talking about does it all the time & embarrasses himself most of the time. That's not important anyway 'cuz you probably didn't know what I meant.

All in all... you can twist & turn & you can embarrass yourself all you want but the major point is Relapse was re-released mostly 'cuz they weren't happy with the commercial status of it & the critical reception just added to it! It is more than obvious actually. POINT BLANK PERIOD!
Feel free to disagree though & keep saying Relapse was a commercial success & it was mostly re-released 'cuz of the reaction of the fans or reviewers. :facepalm
User avatar
Francesco
Genius
Genius
 
Posts: 10853
Joined: Sep 30th, '05, 01:00
Location: Brooklyn NY
Gender: Male

Re: Regarding Relapse conspiracy theories on here

Postby Emadyville » May 8th, '13, 12:43

Francesco wins.

Now lets stay on topic people, thanks.
Menzo wrote:Its cuz you're dope and Daddy Dubs. No one fucks with that


I love you Daren
User avatar
Emadyville
Django
Django
 
Posts: 24833
Joined: Jan 17th, '08, 15:58
Location: Catasauqua PA
Gender: Male

Re: Regarding Relapse conspiracy theories on here

Postby Francesco » May 8th, '13, 13:06

Emadyville wrote:Francesco wins.
Now lets stay on topic people, thanks.


Thanks Emady!
I regret wasting my time on it & I regret getting off topic. :y:

bigray wrote:Wow! That was fun too read :y:


I shouldn't have bothered as it probably annoyed the fuck outta anyone but I was pretty much annoyed as well & that's why I addressed it.
User avatar
Francesco
Genius
Genius
 
Posts: 10853
Joined: Sep 30th, '05, 01:00
Location: Brooklyn NY
Gender: Male

Re: Regarding Relapse conspiracy theories on here

Postby SliK » May 9th, '13, 08:59

Some people have too much free time :loser:

I used to think Eminem made the music he wanted to make. Either that isn't true or the music he genuinely wants to make has changed drastically. But then again, it always changed from album to album. Personally I am glad there was no R2.
SliK
Under The Influence
Under The Influence
 
Posts: 4980
Joined: Dec 17th, '09, 06:03

Re: Regarding Relapse conspiracy theories on here

Postby EminemBase » May 9th, '13, 12:04

Nothing high-class in my glass.
User avatar
EminemBase
Addict
Addict
 
Posts: 10007
Joined: Dec 10th, '09, 06:37
Location: Inside your mind famalamalamalam.
Gender: Male

Re: Regarding Relapse conspiracy theories on here

Postby BlueberryWun » May 9th, '13, 12:53

SliK wrote:Some people have too much free time :loser:

I used to think Eminem made the music he wanted to make. Either that isn't true or the music he genuinely wants to make has changed drastically. But then again, it always changed from album to album. Personally I am glad there was no R2.



That has never been true he admitted always Interscope said unless you make singles like THe Real Slim Shady, Without Me, Just Lose It. We won't release ya album he never wanted to make them type of singles after My Name Is.
Image



MURDER, MURDER YOUNG G STRAPPED WITH HIS BURNER BURNER
User avatar
BlueberryWun
Soldier
Soldier
 
Posts: 742
Joined: May 1st, '13, 16:37
Location: Heathside

Re: Regarding Relapse conspiracy theories on here

Postby EminemBase » May 9th, '13, 13:12

BlueberryWun wrote:
SliK wrote:Some people have too much free time :loser:

I used to think Eminem made the music he wanted to make. Either that isn't true or the music he genuinely wants to make has changed drastically. But then again, it always changed from album to album. Personally I am glad there was no R2.



That has never been true he admitted always Interscope said unless you make singles like THe Real Slim Shady, Without Me, Just Lose It. We won't release ya album he never wanted to make them type of singles after My Name Is.


Yeah but they just wanted hits... and so Em used that formula to re-create the success of "My Name Is" again and again. He analyzed it like a businessman would, and repeated it...

But, the production, the content and style was all Eminem... nothing about the music was actually compromised; it was all him, it was just the fact he amped it up, condensed it and made it catchier.

But Recovery was the first time he TRULY questioned his point of view. And changed.
User avatar
EminemBase
Addict
Addict
 
Posts: 10007
Joined: Dec 10th, '09, 06:37
Location: Inside your mind famalamalamalam.
Gender: Male

PreviousNext

Return to Eminem



Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users