Master Chief wrote:Does anybody realize that the only place where Relapse is liked by the majority is in this forum? Can someone please tell me that you guys are only talking about THIS forum when you say Relapse is more liked than Recovery? Not that it matters if it were a debate about quality. But, Relapse still gets trashed in the real world, other forums, critics. Sure, it's not as bashed and before but people don't like it like here. On TR, in my opinion, Relapse is extremely overrated. To the point of vomit. This forum would mislead Eminem and make him think people actually think Relapse is his best album.
Well that's very unlikely to be true. Think about what you're saying logically...
Do you think the
people on TRShady have special DNA? genes or cells in them that make them appreciate
Relapse differently to the rest of the world?
Of course not. The people here are humans. We all think in patterns, we're all predictable, we're all made of the same stuff. If a lot of people here like it, a lot of people everywhere like it. Just because it's not the majority doesn't mean it's not widespread.
Then you have the fact it's narrowed down to fans of Eminem. SO if fans of Eminem HERE like it, fans of Eminem LOTS OF PLACES like it.
Relapse is definitely not his best album, but it's definitely not trash and what's more frustrating than what you see as it being 'overrated' (which couldn't be less true) is the repetitive asshole critics who want to hear the same predictable emotional drivel out of Em's mouth calling the album trash. And people taking them seriously.
I've read the reviews of
Relapse, and them not liking the album is no big whoop. 80% of them shouldn't even have jobs as critics as they're not worth the dust, crumbs and cum in their keyboards they write their godawful reviews with. Most of them are personally hellbent and bias, almost every critic I read is a fucking moron.
There are a handful of logical, sensible or decent critics but those are usually found on Independent blogs etc. - most of the critics who reviewed
Relapse just... I mean, the themes of the album are hardly ingenious, it's not hard to understand. But his presentation and format is very interesting, and most of them cannot see past their distaste for the content or 'accents' to appreciate that.
It's not about whether you like the content, that's a personal taste issue, it's about defining and critiquing the aims. The aim of Eminem on
Relapse is to come across as a sadistic, sophisticated, strange, slap-happy maniac / killer / drug fiend and yada yada. So the question as a critic, is not "do I like that idea?" as anybody can ask themselves that. The question is "did the artist achieve his aims?" or some other question that examines the result over intent.
Not everybody can examine an artist's result and critique and break it down well. But anybody can give an opinion. So if all these critics are going to do is give their opinion, they're literally fucking useless and do not deserve the title (though it's hardly an honorable one) of 'critic'.
So if I was Em, or any artist, I wouldn't be too worried about those turds not approving of my material. I'd be more concerned about my peers and like-minded people who get my vision or artistry approving of it. Even then, it shouldn't matter, all that matters is what YOU think.
Plenty of work gets trashed early-on and then later praised too. For plenty of reasons. Stanley Kubrick's films are a prime example of that. And one of the likely reasons for
Relapse being more trashed than it deserves is due to the fact it was his comeback album and it was about what it was about, and presented the way it was.
The reaction to
Recovery was far more fitting and realistic. The basic overall consensus was that it was a consistent lyrical and rapping performance from Em, and shitty, loud production. Which, is pretty much spot-on.
Where as the consensus from most on
Relapse was that it was 'silly' (so any accent that is not distinctly American is 'silly' now? this doesn't look so good coming from American critics... Americans, who already get accused by the world of being culturally ignorant and egotistical) accents and bad music. Where as... if you appreciate rhyming and flows at all, there's no way you could arrive at that consensus, regardless of whether you like the content or style(s).
Which to me just proves that the majority consensus is misguided and untrue. Critics and people were so eager, as they are when any big artist returns, to pick apart the comeback - ESPECIALLY Eminem given how tongue-in-cheek, provocative, dismissive and loudmouth (as an artist) he was. But mainly I think it's just people couldn't see past the strange presentation.
I do remember one critic saying something like it was "a master toying with form" and that it was "abstract" though. Which is much more like it. And on-point.