skc_ wrote:the leak hype is not very high in here
Its not time yet fam. Couple of days and peeps will start going nuts
skc_ wrote:the leak hype is not very high in here
Mr Change wrote:DetroitSkills wrote:Flac only elitest. Fuck yalls poverty ears
what kinda sound difference is there between FLAC and say, 320kbps or 256VBR?
6PRDMD9 wrote:Lol 256 is all I need, saves room on my computer and phone
Yoda wrote:@Detroit. Ah right. I.thought flac came from a different source. And I wasn't too sure if you could convert into flac from 320 because it's step up in sound quality.
Trey wrote:The 19th is the correct answer.
DetroitSkills wrote:Yoda wrote:@Detroit. Ah right. I.thought flac came from a different source. And I wasn't too sure if you could convert into flac from 320 because it's step up in sound quality.
Not nessicarily. Theres 24 n 16bit flacs. What makes the difference is mainly the sample rate 24bit 96khz shits on 320/48khz
Another thing btw, ur really better off with wav if ur ripping ur own albums, wav is uncompressed lossless and flac is compressed lossless. But thats just being ultra picky because u cant record analog vinyl in wav
And nah flac comes from natural sources, cds vinyls etc. theres no magic flac fairy
TranSlucEnt wrote:Depending on Dskills for that iTunes rip ya hear me nig
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot]