How crazy would it be

by **Blu** » Jan 17th, '13, 05:15

If on Em's next album there was a song called Criminal Pt. II and it was over the same Criminal beat, just different lyrics. Would be fucking dope.

by **UofLCard** » Jan 17th, '13, 05:16

It would be.

by **ImANoob** » Jan 17th, '13, 05:17

or it would ruin a classic :whistle:

by **tadpole25** » Jan 17th, '13, 05:26

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QbSQ8JbyQo8

by **Eminemeatinm&m** » Jan 17th, '13, 06:10

Yall say if em come back to a previus style, it will suck, but I bet yall will be celebratin if that shit happened.

by **Blu** » Jan 17th, '13, 06:27

He's not redoing it, it's a sequel.

by **Jimmy Conway** » Jan 17th, '13, 07:45

Sequels to anything are rarely good. Most of the time the first movie was better than the others. I would say the same to this. Though I did like Drug ballad better than Cum on Everybody. But the beat was altered.

Eminem isn't as good as he was then. It's as simple as that. So all it would result in is a 150 page thread of the stans screaming he is back, that it's the best song they've heard in years, that he's perfect. And the non stans bitching about Em using old beats, beating a dead horse, breaking the shitty lyrics apart and being mad that he doesn't sound like a 20 something year old anymore.

It's a horrible idea and you should feel bad for even mentioning it.

by **EminemBase** » Jan 17th, '13, 10:35

Would been kinda corny I think.

by **Jason M.** » Jan 17th, '13, 13:43

Any return to his 1999-2000 style will sound corny on a 40 year old man who proved he can make fucking incredible serious music.

by **TheGentlePlayer** » Jan 17th, '13, 15:26

Blu wrote:If on Em's next album there was a song called Criminal Pt. II and it was over the same Criminal beat, just different lyrics. Would be fucking dope.

"Life is drah, NOW SPELL IT BACKWARDS BITCH"

No thanks

by **ShadyxEminem** » Jan 17th, '13, 18:31

What about a Stan pt. 2 or would that ruin a classic too?

And wasn't there suppose to be a Stan part 2, but he gave the beat to Weezy?

by **Blu** » Jan 17th, '13, 19:12

Stan Pt. II is unnecessary.

by **Trimss** » Jan 17th, '13, 19:15

That's Anne. (The Weezy Stan p2) and it was honestly good.

by **LMShady** » Jan 17th, '13, 19:15

Stan Part II would always have been cool if it was called "Matthew" from his little brother's perspective when he's older I thought...

by **Kill You** » Jan 17th, '13, 19:22

LMShady wrote:Stan Part II would always have been cool if it was called "Matthew" from his little brother's perspective when he's older I thought...

If he ever did a sequel to Stan then he should do it like you just said. Call it Matthew and it would be another story-telling, jumping in and out of character track.

How crazy would it be

How crazy would it be

Re: How crazy would it be

Re: How crazy would it be

Re: How crazy would it be

Re: How crazy would it be

Re: How crazy would it be

Re: How crazy would it be

Re: How crazy would it be

Re: How crazy would it be

Re: How crazy would it be

Re: How crazy would it be

Re: How crazy would it be

Re: How crazy would it be

Re: How crazy would it be

Re: How crazy would it be

Who is online