Should Tech and Krizz be in Slaughterhouse?

[King Lance]

wasn't he talking about you ?

Confirmed. "L"ision trying to flip my words.

Elision took more L's than Nas in his life, he took more L's than kdot at the grammys

[King Lance]

What about Raul?

Is he still on Trshady ?

[CanadaPure]

[King Lance]

[PAINKILLƎR]

Classic

[Elision]

I understand that much from Rapgenius. But the thing is, if we just take these lines as they are and disregard that we already know the verse is about his music, these lines make no sense whatsoever.

but why would you do that?

Once again, given the verse ONLY and nothing else, I have no idea what the fuck he's talking about. I am given no context, nor am I given any idea of what this "remedy" is for. For all I know, Tech could secretly be a doctor, handing out medicine for free but getting slammed by people who don't understand that he's just trying to help.

but you can't take away the dudes entire context given that it's on a tech n9ne album. tech has been mentioning this jeff weiss incident for years, this time he just made a full verse it. and it's not like he could've done it back in 2009 because he hadn't heard fragile yet, no beat had told him to write it until this one. which is techs method, the beats tell him what to do.

The fuck does that mean?

To fan someone away. It's a common term. It's like get out of my face.

You still haven't explained what the fuck he's talking about. You just repeated what I'm saying, which is that his "jam" (once again, I think he means a song, but you can never be sure with Tech) is deaf and impeccable, but what does that MEAN? It makes no sense.

Okay I think it's safe to assume english isn't your first language. Which is fine. Again it's 'def' not 'deaf'. def is like dope.

How is he not switching topics? He was talking about how other underground artists are (in general) "slammed" by critics, then suddenly, he's talking about his personal experience.

His personal experience of being slammed by critics. How is that a change of subject?

Once again, fuck that. I want to be able to decipher the verse without having to catch up on the latest edition of "The Adventures of Tech N9ne". And even WITH that, the line STILL doesn't make any sense. In fact, that article can only be applied to the next couple of lines.

You don't have to catch up on anything, tech has been talking about this incident for years. Also your quote is wrong it's "by the Times it'll be better leaving in the store". He's saying that the guy who wrote the article has no actual perspective on tech's performance and thus it's best to just ignore him.

No, they don't. More evidence comes from the fact that the words "Jeff" and "Weiss" don't appear ANYWHERE on this track. How am I supposed to know that he's talking about this ONE LINE that ONE CRITIC said about him in ONE ARTICLE?

Because assuming you're buying an album this deep into his career, you're probably familiar with some of his older stuff. Wouldn't it be worse if he spent half of every album getting everybody up to date? That'd be ridiculous dude come on.

Excuse me for getting off-topic, but I'd like to elaborate on this, actually. Why does Tech insist on making entire verses, or in the case of Fortune Force Field, AN ENTIRE FUCKING SONG stretching out one tiny issue? So this ONE GUY criticized you. With one line. Get the fuck over it, Tech. Anyways, back to the song.

These aren't tiny issues. And the guy who criticized him did so in a hugely popular magazine that belongs to a town he lives in. It was a very big deal.

"hopes for your demise"? What is Tech talking about? Is he saying that HE hopes for the critic's demise? Well, no. He wouldn't say "your" then. Maybe the critic is hoping for Tech's demise, but that wouldn't make any sense, either. One line in a single review isn't exactly "hoping for Tech's demise". And why would Tech say "your" instead of "my"?

He's saying the critic is a hater who hopes for the demise of others. How are you not getting this?

You sure?

chizzel
A dancing banana with two heads. All chizzels are chinks, but not all chinks are chizzels

chizzel
To chizzel is not just to make statue art, but also a code word for shoplifting. One who is in the store would imply that "they would chizzel that" and usually do.

chizzel
chiz has a weener that looks like a snitzel,a little chiz would be a disaster. Chiz has scrot rot and gives anal to passing homosexuals.

Yes I'm sure. Not sure where you're getting these definitions from though

wait what? what did I say that doesn't hold water?

[King Lance]

Every lyric site I look at says "deaf"

[Elision]

na... this is "deaf"

what makes you think that? deaf = lack of hearing. that makes no sense in this context.

[CanadaPure]

Every time Elision posts I just can't handle it.

but you can't take away the dudes entire context given that it's on a tech n9ne album. tech has been mentioning this jeff weiss incident for years, this time he just made a full track verse it. and it's not like he could've done it back in 2009 because he hadn't heard fragile yet, no beat had told him to write it until this one. which is techs method, the beats tell him what to do.

Okay I think it's safe to assume english isn't your first language. Which is fine. Again it's 'def' not 'deaf'. def is like dope.

His personal experience of being slammed by critics. How is that a change of subject?

You don't have to catch up on anything, tech has been talking about this incident for years. Also your quote is wrong it's "by the Times it'll be better leaving in the store". He's saying that the guy who wrote the article has no actual perspective on tech's performance and thus it's best to just ignore him.

Because assuming you're buying an album this deep into his career, you're probably familiar with some of his older stuff. Wouldn't it be worse if he spent half of every album getting everybody up to date? That'd be ridiculous dude come on.

These aren't tiny issues. And the guy who criticized him did so in a hugely popular magazine that belongs to a town he lives in. It was a very big deal.

He's saying the critic is a hater who hopes for the demise of others. How are you not getting this?

Yes I'm sure. Not sure where you're getting these definitions from though

[Elision]

Every time Elision posts I just can't handle it.

Why? What's wrong with my posts?

[CanadaPure]

Every time Elision posts I just can't handle it.

Why? What's wrong with my posts?

You're reaching SO hard to try and justify Techs verse as being good.

[Elision]

Every time Elision posts I just can't handle it.

Why? What's wrong with my posts?

You're reaching SO hard to try and justify Techs verse as being good.

What's an example of me reaching even slightly? And while I do believe it is good that's not what we're talking about. I'm saying it makes perfect sense.

edit: which it does. i refuse to believe you guys are this stupid i feel like i'm getting punked or something

which is techs method, the beats tell him what to do.

The beats keep 'telling him' to make flimsy tracks with terrible guest features.

Yes, most of techs features are shit, I've never understood most of them. That said I don't know why you're saying his tracks are flimsy. I mean yeah, there's a flimsy one here and there, like any other artist, but for the most part techs music hits harder than almost anyone. his sound is big as fuck, the dude dominates tracks, especially when he's a feature. in fact i challenge you to find me one feature verse that he didn't renegade.

[CanadaPure]

[quote="Elision"]i refuse to believe you guys are this stupid i feel like i'm getting punked or something /quote]

I feel the exact same way about your posts, I'm wondering if you are just master trolling all of us.

[Satan]

Sound like when somebody get hit on Batman
Always looking for the pussy - CAT-scan
Booty's always being watched - black man

AND I GOT HER NIGGA - GROCERY BAG

[Trimss]

unga badaboomnga