diction wrote:Wheras Freespeech, this song was hardly Nas' and the real lowpoints where the other verses and the hook, Nas' actual verse was just subpar but still listenable.
Are you arguing with me, because that's exactly what I said...
diction wrote:Wheras Freespeech, this song was hardly Nas' and the real lowpoints where the other verses and the hook, Nas' actual verse was just subpar but still listenable.



classthe_king wrote:^^^Shut the fuck up. This is why people say you're a stan. He made possibly the worst rap song ever, whether it was intentional or not, it doesn't matter.

FreeSpeech wrote:diction wrote:Wheras Freespeech, this song was hardly Nas' and the real lowpoints where the other verses and the hook, Nas' actual verse was just subpar but still listenable.
Are you arguing with me, because that's exactly what I said...

EminemBase wrote:classthe_king wrote:^^^Shut the fuck up. This is why people say you're a stan. He made possibly the worst rap song ever, whether it was intentional or not, it doesn't matter.
Of course it matters you retard.
It makes no sense to call an intentionally silly song silly as if it's an accident.
That is literally like watching fucking South Park and seeing say, the Gordon Ramsay impression and saying "that's the worst impression ever" as if Trey Parker failed at doing the impression. He fucking intended it to be awful.
I'm not a Stan because I don't agree with your retarded logic. Like I said, I'm not saying the song is not awful. If you find it awful then you find it awful, but yes the intention changes everything.


classthe_king wrote:EminemBase wrote:classthe_king wrote:^^^Shut the fuck up. This is why people say you're a stan. He made possibly the worst rap song ever, whether it was intentional or not, it doesn't matter.
Of course it matters you retard.
It makes no sense to call an intentionally silly song silly as if it's an accident.
That is literally like watching fucking South Park and seeing say, the Gordon Ramsay impression and saying "that's the worst impression ever" as if Trey Parker failed at doing the impression. He fucking intended it to be awful.
I'm not a Stan because I don't agree with your retarded logic. Like I said, I'm not saying the song is not awful. If you find it awful then you find it awful, but yes the intention changes everything.
Oh so Eminem was just like, "Hey Dre, I have the funniest idea ever yo. I'm going to make the worst rap song of all time. It will be SOOOOOO funny."
lolololololololol shut the fuck up. You're delusional.

EminemBase wrote:Nooooooooooo. Eminem decided to make a retarded song thinking it was funny.
You think I'm delusional for thinking Eminem meant a song called "Big Weenie" to be silly?
I see those silly songs as throwaway songs and yes they're bad songs. But they're not the same as trying to make a song good and genuine and it coming across shit. That's WORSE.



classthe_king wrote:But he failed miserably, creating a song that wasn't even close to funny and and embarrasment to not only himself, but the genre as a whole.
classthe_king wrote:No, you're delusional because you think since because he made it bad on purpose it wasn't as bad. "Yo, that 1/10 song isn't as bad as that 4/10 song because he made it bad on purpose."
classthe_king wrote:No it's not.

classthe_king wrote:And yes we know you think this is a shit song, but we're not going to give a free pass to Eminem, just because he supposedly intended to make a "silly" song. It's like giving credit for an Eminem song being relatable, without actually addressing the execution off it.

EminemBase wrote:No you fail miserably for failing to understand intent. You're a cretin.
The only thing I have debated is intent and yet you fail to comprehend that's the only aim of my argument. I'm not saying the songs should be rated higher, I'm saying a purposely ridiculous song is not as bad as a song which is trying to be serious - but comes across ridiculous.
Like I said, would you consider a purposely bad, joke impression by Trey Parker to be in the same category as a genuinely failed impression, by somebody trying to actually replicate somebody?


classthe_king wrote:I know what intent is you jack ass. Intent doesn't matter.
classthe_king wrote:No I completely understand your argument, but your argument is wrong. When a purposely ridiculous song is more ridiculous than an accidental ridiculous song it it still more ridiculous, and therefore, worse.
classthe_king wrote:Jesus, we get the damn analogy, you don't need to say it 5 times. This is rap, not comedy.



classthe_king wrote:Do you even understand what you're saying. Nas didn't make this song to be profound or anything, it was just an average rap verse, maybe even slightly below average. Eminem made a HORRIBLE song, stupid as fuck, one of the worst songs of all time, whether that's what he was trying to do or not. As The World Turns is a silly song? Yes? And that is a great song.
classthe_king wrote:Runner A was trying to win the race
Runner B was trying to come in dead last.
Runner A came in 5th and Runner B came in dead last. Who finished higher in the race?

EminemBase wrote:I'm not saying to give Eminem a 'free pass'.
I'm saying, those songs are in a different category. Now, a song like "Mosh" is more up for debate as a bad song in my opinion. A song where he's genuinely lazy or tired and trying to achieve something but failing.
The aim of "Fack" was to be stupid as fuck. Is that not what it is?...
Now, if you wanna talk execution, I don't think the flow is bad I just think the song content is absurd so that's why it's a bad song. But it achieves its goal in being stupid as fuck...
So that's a lot different than a song aiming for X and failing to achieve X.



Users browsing this forum: No registered users