

HereHere wrote:Berry wrote:DanWS wrote:It's one of my favorites of all time by him too. So why did it do so shit on the "Ranking Marshall" poll? Sometimes I think people just don't want to believe that his new songs are as good as his older stuff, so will always vote in favor of his older material coz its seen as "classic" while his new stuff isn't.... yet.
Trshady in a nutshell.
Don't you dare bash TES or the MMLP.
![]()
![]()
As much as I love TES and MMLP, this is so true.



classthe_king wrote:
Maybe it's because his old stuff does shit on his new stuff





MikeNUFC wrote:To be fair his old stuff does shit on his newer stuff. In almost every aspect.
Not that I'm expecting it to be better, just saying.

HereHere wrote:MikeNUFC wrote:To be fair his old stuff does shit on his newer stuff. In almost every aspect.
Not that I'm expecting it to be better, just saying.
If you're talking about MMLP and TES, then I agree. But SSLP doesn't come close to Recovery, that's just my opinion though.
Anyhoo, that wasn't what I was meaning. People seem to overlook the faults on his early work but nitpick his new work.




HereHere wrote:Anyhoo, that wasn't what I was meaning. People seem to overlook the faults on his early work but nitpick his new work.
xxTrigger1989xx wrote:What is there not to like?

MikeNUFC wrote:SSLP is my favourite Eminem album.
He didnt waste a line on that entire CD. The multies were just extraordinary and his storytelling skills are on another level. The second verse of Brain Damage is exceptional. Conceptually it was outstanding as well.
I also feel it had the best production.
In terms of writing and rhyming, this was his peak. MMLP and TES has more emotion, arguably more direction, but I just feel SSLP showed not only incredible rhyming, but such variety; going from Rock Bottom to Brain Damage to Bad Meets Evil to My Name Is to Guilty Conscience in one album is masterful.
It's only recently that it's become my favourite as well.
I can see how the nasally voice would turn of some, just like the accent did to some on Relapse, but in both cases didnt effect me at all.HereHere wrote:Anyhoo, that wasn't what I was meaning. People seem to overlook the faults on his early work but nitpick his new work.
I feel people do this becuase, quite simply, there is so much more faults with his newer stuff than his older stuff. His first 3 albums are almost flawless, in terms of rhyming, whereas Recovery has quite a lot of faults in that department. Hence the nitpicking.xxTrigger1989xx wrote:What is there not to like?
It has variety but that's not why some (including me) are critical. It's mainly due to the overload of punchlines; many of which are terrible. It has duds in WBD, WTP and NA, which are so much worse than his early albums worst tracks. Also the flow throughout the album is as natural or smooth as he used to have it. Too much stop and go tactics
If your going on "types of tracks" then you cant fault a great deal but thats not the main reason a lot of peopel listen to Em. Just cus a song has a nice style doesnt mean it's good automatically.




MikeNUFC wrote:Dont get me wrong, I like Recovery. Has some great tracks on there. I just think it's nowhere near his first 3 albums and not that much better than Relapse.




TRshady wrote:The server is indeed unaware of the greatness that is DanWS.

TRshady wrote:The server is indeed unaware of the greatness that is DanWS.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users