


TJthaGreat wrote:I'm not calling him a LEGEND,but he WAS one of the best ever.

Jaz wrote:TJthaGreat wrote:I'm not calling him a LEGEND,but he WAS one of the best ever.
How so? He didn't exactly have an extensive catalog of solo work, and what he had was good.. but one of the greatest? I guess it depends on what you're definition of "one of the greatest" is. To me you gotta be in the top... idk 25 to ever do it to take that title? He's just not there.


TJthaGreat wrote:Jaz wrote:TJthaGreat wrote:I'm not calling him a LEGEND,but he WAS one of the best ever.
How so? He didn't exactly have an extensive catalog of solo work, and what he had was good.. but one of the greatest? I guess it depends on what you're definition of "one of the greatest" is. To me you gotta be in the top... idk 25 to ever do it to take that title? He's just not there.
I don't think one of the "greatest" and one of the "best" is the same thing.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users