Would you rather hear someone who has rhymes for days and varying flows, but has no creative bone in their body, or someone that has innovative concepts, and their own unique sound which can't be replicated?
And yeah, I know the two are congrous, and you can't fully separate them but choose one. And yes there are a lot of skilled musicians that aren't creative in any way, but most innovative musicians are skilled to a degree.
They both go hand in hand, but if I had to choose probably originality, but some skill is needed other wise the music would be utter trash.
And like always those who try something innovative run the risk of it completely sucking, but that's expected. I will sayy however trying to be original just for the sake of being original is counterproductive.










