Quite interesting.. (video)

[dantespyke]

It is needed in this disscussion where it seems everyone else hates America and Bush, and already knew that it was a set up. I didnt say the theory states a plane didnt hit the building. They claim its impossible for a building to collapse with fire. I was saying that the structural integrity of the building would be much weaker allowing it to be collapsed by the fire. In my opinon the explosion theory is very very unlikely.

Where would these explosives be placed? At the base of the building? That would make sense but it asks the question how would you be able to get that much explosive into a building like that, set it up and arm it without anyone noticing?

[Ivy]

It is needed in this disscussion where it seems everyone else hates America and Bush, and already knew that it was a set up. I didnt say the theory states a plane didnt hit the building. They claim its impossible for a building to collapse with fire. I was saying that the structural integrity of the building would be much weaker allowing it to be collapsed by the fire. In my opinon the explosion theory is very very unlikely.

Where would these explosives be placed? At the base of the building? That would make sense but it asks the question how would you be able to get that much explosive into a building like that, set it up and arm it without anyone noticing?

See, I have my theories, but I also have the same logical thinking as you...There was oxygen and heat, and flammables in the Towers, so the explosions could have been caused by the fire and other natural things in the Towers and shit...but also...with viewing the video, both of them...there's no way the Towers or those questions could be correct, no plane hit the Pentagon, Fox News says that alone. I'm conducting a lot of research and I'm going to right my results and finding and post them here, enjoy the reading. I will provide both sides, not one...being a fellow American and growing up in the Military, I know what the government is capable of and its limits...it's all a matter of facts seperated by the opinions...

[AspirinE]

It is needed in this disscussion where it seems everyone else hates America and Bush, and already knew that it was a set up. I didnt say the theory states a plane didnt hit the building. They claim its impossible for a building to collapse with fire. I was saying that the structural integrity of the building would be much weaker allowing it to be collapsed by the fire. In my opinon the explosion theory is very very unlikely.

Where would these explosives be placed? At the base of the building? That would make sense but it asks the question how would you be able to get that much explosive into a building like that, set it up and arm it without anyone noticing?

The fire?
You cant actually say for sure that fire could bring the building down, especially building 7....
Were would these explosives be placed?
Well if we do consider that its an inside job, that becomes much easier, a car or two. It can be done, if enough money and people are involved.

This video is a theory, its made for consideration, and i posted it for people to watch it, and maybe share a few counter arguements, coz i am pretty much willing to see the other side of thesituation.

I would love to know wat the goverments full theory is, but unfortunately theres too much unexposed evidence for me to judge that side of the argument.