mcZu wrote:EminemBase wrote:mcZu wrote:How's his flow not good? His flow was good, as far as I can make up from that snippet. Lyrically it's good too, it's basically bragging. He's making sense.. This isn't a Canibus verse.
Yeah but I can see his point.
It's not that it literally does not make sense just that it's nonsense lyricism because it's so void of character or direction. It's robotic, drab and arbitrary. And most of us here could write it. There's not enough spacing in it, too bunched up and ill-thought.
Good lyricism needs to be a marriage of many things. Technicality and rhyming is only part of it, but with that kind of writing, it becomes all of it.
Most of us here couldn't. Check CW, rhyming isn't that easy. Plus, I don't think it's void of character, it's basically Crooked's character. The fast paced, heavy multies packed, bars are part of his character. I wouldn't call it robotic, it's consistent, yeah, but that's the rhythm of his flow.
I do agree with you that good lyricism needs to more than just that, but what Crooked I does usually is perfect for a brag track. And he's capable of more, he proved that on Raindrops.
Oh come on, you couldn't write what Amadeo just wrote?
That kind of writing is very easy. It's the type of thing I would write as a kid, desperate to sound impressive, not having anything worth saying, type of thing Eminem wrote on Infinite but soon grew out of.
It's void of character as anybody could be saying those lines and it'd make no difference, there's no idendity and more than that, there's not enough thought through the lines. It's for its own sake, which would be fine but it's just done in such a... meh way.
It's not hard to think "hmm... dominance / prominence / documents" etc. and then find a way to link them. It is hard however to think of metaphors, references, tongue-in-cheek moments and rhymes upon rhymes then link them all with conversational-style lyricism like Em does (when on-point). That's character.