One thing that's to be said, or that's at least been said by a lot of critics throughout the course of his career is that Em has long albums. I think he has so much material and really likes to give a hefty batch. If you notice though, a lot of classics, or... a good amount at least have a small amount like Illmatic. Usually 11-13, something about 13 that seems about right.
Em always has at least 15 I think and maybe a few of his albums could of done with better selection or even just being shorter. I'm an Em fan so I like more material anyway but I can see where critics are coming from. I'm glad Recovery had no skits.
So lets assume you could only have 13 tracks on Recovery. What would you keep and how would you structure it? Don't just name your top 13, order it as you would want to here it and how you think it would be best presented if only X 13 could be there.
Mine would probably be...
1. Cold Wind Blows
2. On Fire
3. Talkin' 2 Myself
4. So Bad
5. W.T.P.
6. Seduction
7. Not Afraid
8. Going Through Changes
9, Space Bound
10. 25 to Life
11. Cinderella Man
12. Almost Famous
13. You're Never Over
Would less tracks make it a classic to you? I used to just consider Recovery a really good album but have thought up until now it just didn't have that classic 'spark'.
But for some reason, more it's been setting in the more coherent it all seems. The production all seems to work for me now when I listen to it through, before it felt random but when you really listen - all the beats gel really. Mostly similar drum patterns over bass lines etc. and every song is decent and sounds like it should be on the album.
Even the sequencing is making more sense to me.
It's actually seeming not far off a classic to me now. And the lyricism is so dense like... I always knew it was good but felt ultimately a bit like it was just still so under par in comparison to old work but when I really listen again (even though I've heard it 1,000 times over)... I don't know... I think time has just improved it. It's just 'set in' as an album.
It's pretty much near-flawless - by which I don't mean the content, ideas and album's worth are near-flawless - I'm still expecting better on all fronts. But I mean, in its own right, in what it is... it's near-flawless in every aspect. I think it would be a lot better if he produced it all but it's a great album that I think will only garner more praise overtime. Just like we're seeing with Relapse, I think it might just start dawning on people how good Recovery is (fans I mean) more and more.
I think part of it is the expectations. Due to the length of time he was gone and what everyone keeps expecting, each album feels like a shell-shock puzzle that takes a while to adjust to. Of course there is still some corny lines and bad lyricism on Recovery but the good stuff far outweighs the bad and there is only a few truly cringy lines. One being "guess that's why they call it window pain".
I'd say Recovery is a possible future classic though. And in say... 10 years, after he's made maybe 3 more solo albums - I think it may be placed a lot higher in people's (and critics minds) by then. Kind of how like It Was Written was so steam rolled by the expectations after Illmatic but then with time, it got its fair shake. Now, before anybody takes that analogy literally (always happens) - I'm not saying Recovery is Em's it Was Written. I just mean it may go through a similar treatment.