k block wrote:Now you're playing games. You're relying on things you didn't say, yet you know were implied by your posts. Judging from the examples you gave, (the beatles, etc) it would lead one to believe that, since hip hp is a newer genre, you are speaking about the foundations of hip hop being laid with rock-roots.
No no, YOU are playing games. You are now trying to back-peddle your way out of words you put in my mouth. And, you'd be wise to check the history here, as it's recorded. And believe me, everything is in my favour, so think on.
I made a post saying everybody borrows from everybody, and basically that many genres are meshes and upshots of other genres. And as part of that post I used the example of rock and hip-hop, as they're two common-ground genres to speak on which most people know about.
At no point did I say rock was the influence for the foundation of hip-hop.
In fact, this is exactly what I said:
SO then take the fact, early hip-hop groups certainly took influence or borrowed elements directly from or from people who were influenced or by those peopleEARLY hip-hop groups / took influence. Where in that do I say ALL hip-hop was based on rock? Were Run-DMC not an early hip-hop group? and did they not take influence from rock... I rest my case.
k block wrote:Now, of course you didn't say this outright, so you can easily claim I'm wrong for misinterpreting what you said; but we both know exactly what you meant; and you're wrong. Trying to claim, "i didn't specify a specific era." Is bullshit and you know it. and considering one of your arguments was that hip hop isn't ' black music' (which was my counter argument; not the rock argument) only fuels my belief that you were using rock as an example of am influential foundation for your reasoning behind hip hop not being purely black music. I then pointed out your error and I must have embarrassed you because you got defensive and quickly tried covering it up. Facts are facts. Omitting something but implying it is the same as directly saying it.
No that doesn't work I'm afraid. You can't bend logic to fit your definition of it. Reality is reality as we know it, not as you choose it, k?
block.
You can't decide I'm implying something, decide you're right in your assumption of my implication, speak upon it like it's a fact and then conclude I'm the one who's being ambiguous lmao. You fool.
I'm not covering up anything, I have zero to hide. Would I really be inviting you and others to check the history of this and be quoting myself if I did... ? You just keep making it worse. Here's what REALLY happened thus far...
1. I made a post saying everybody borrows from everybody, basically just to make the point that very little is 'original' and it's babyish, futile and missing the point entirely to try and claim a race or one true source to a genre or artistic creation.
- I used British rock artists as an example because it illustrates the contrast of what I was saying perfectly. The constant clash and tit for tat mix and matching of UK / US culture.
2. You misread / misunderstood my post as me saying rock was the influence for the entire foundation of hip-hop and then began posting along that line of assumption as if reality. This being the perfect example of your fatal error / personal shape-shifting of what's actually true and what you assume, and would like to be true so you can argue with me.
3. Because you are arrogant and self-righteous, there's no way on Earth you'll admit you're wrong / either that or you're too stupid to see you're wrong and still genuinely think I was saying rock was the foundation of all hip-hop

- Either way, you're now trying to once again flip reality to fit your favour, trying to make it seem as if I'm the one back-peddling.
My entire fucking point was that hip-hop is the sum of many parts, as are most genres. My point was that very little is just IT in an original form. Things borrow from each other by nature, people borrow from each other, we all take influence in abundance in constantly shifting variables. And that's truer in nowhere but art. So if that's my point, do you seriously think I'd be saying rock is the entire foundation for hip-hop? My god you're stupid.
But, unfortunately your pathetic blunder and lame tactics are as obvious as a hard-on in maths class. So be gone, moron.