Block wrote:That is probably the single best analogy for that type of situation. Displaying the fact that, despite a person's upbringing, they are still held responsible for their actions as adults, and are made to suffer the consiquences.
This makes sense on its own.
Block wrote:If a child grows being molested, then goes and does it to more children when he is older, is he not still a pedophile? Same concept; different results.
This makes sense on its own. Except if it is applied to Eminem's situation, you prove nothing. Presumably, doing it 'to more children when he is older' = Eminem behaving, dressing, talking like a black person as an older person. So, a child 'being molested' = Eminem being influenced and shaped by the black environment he grew up in, as a child.
The part of your analogy that is a crime for the person in the analogy is the 'being a paedophile part'. This deserves punishment. But, behaving like a black person is not a crime, unless, according to you, it is an act. But your analogy directly involves the effect of being molested as causing the person to be a paedophile, or, being in a black environment causing Eminem to act like a black person.
All you are essentially saying is that a paedophile deserves punishment, even if he was molested as a child. Have a cookie.