classthe_king wrote:Really? Let's look at the facts of this thread.
1. Everyone's goal is to create good music
2. Nas wanted to create a serious, good song
3. Eminem wanted to create a song that was stupid as fuck, but still a good song.
4. Nas failed, only creating an average, 4/10 song
5. Eminem succeeded in creating a song that was stupid as fuck (which is actually a failure in itself), but failed in creating a good song as his song was a 1/10
6. Nas' song is better than Eminem's song
7. Eminem fails more than Nas
Look what happens when you use logic?
Tut tut. You call THAT logic?
Firstly, you cannot 'logically' state a song is 4/10, or 1/10 or whatever spurious rating you choose to personally give it and act as if that's an objective fact.
The only objective FACTS you displayed there were that two artists made two songs and that you think one is better than the other. It's not an objective fact that Nas' song is 4/10 because 'out of ten' doesn't even fucking exist, it's in your imagination. It's not a measurable statistic, it's art, and preference.
You can not measure how much each artist 'failed' because one man's meat is another man's poison. Nothing there is truly measurable and therefore, it's not logic. Because it's not truly objective. All you can do is use elements of logic to back-up your opinion as best you can.
It's not an objective truth that Nas made a 'better' song. Music is not sports, or science. You can't state which song is better or demonstrate it with facts. So you cannot therefore objectively prove me wrong on the grounds of logic that he did that.
So, not only did you lose the argument, continuously but you've just displayed the most retarded attempt at closure 'logic' I have ever seen. Once again, you fail. Know your place little child.