I think it's cool if he meant it or not
And I don't understand how you can disprove it's coolness by saying it goes over 6:00 minutes -_-
jinofthewind wrote:And Koolo's sources said... Nothing you idiots Koolo's sources are dead they're locked in my basement
Lello wrote:Master Chief wrote:whiteamerica wrote:nollie has not yet posted and "wack-as-fuck" lines from old Em.
thus, new Em is a piece of shit as claimed.
You think GOAT is a good song, shut the fuck up.
GOAT is horrible but old em applies to 97-03....
Amaranthine wrote:Whether it was planned or not, that is the sickest thing ever. Amazing.![]()
I read this on Rap Genius a month or two ago.
buffalo bill wrote:Asd-ONE wrote:he goes 7:25 without saying "fucking" so makes no sense to begin with.
this.
Would have been very good otherwise. If it had actually BEEN 6 minutes. But "the rest of that song plus the whole of the next song".. So what?
Omar Khalid wrote:buffalo bill wrote:Asd-ONE wrote:he goes 7:25 without saying "fucking" so makes no sense to begin with.
this.
Would have been very good otherwise. If it had actually BEEN 6 minutes. But "the rest of that song plus the whole of the next song".. So what?
So what, it doesn't matter if it's 6 mins or longer as long as he kept his promise
Omar Khalid wrote:So what, it doesn't matter if it's 6 mins or longer as long as he kept his promise
Good For Nothing wrote:It's mind blowing, if someone finally discovered that after TEN years of it's release, imagine how many more hidden gems there are on all of his albums.
Asd-ONE wrote:If you listen to Kim backwards it's about Eminem finding his wife dead, resurrecting her with a knife and driving home to their baby daughter.
|Buddy| wrote:The reason 'I'm back' has no "fucking" is because it was meant to be the first single, before TRSS happened.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users