Who the fuck are Ch3l5ea?!!!!
God damn that game was awesome! We came back twice and won with two goals. RvP scored more PL goals at Stamford Bridge yesterday than Torres have for Chelsea since he came. Hahahaha!
. - MCSam
BigBangBazinga wrote:
RvP scored more PL goals at Stamford Bridge yesterday than Torres have for Chelsea since he came. Hahahaha!



BigBangBazinga wrote:Who the fuck are Ch3l5ea?!!!!
God damn that game was awesome! We came back twice and won with two goals. RvP scored more PL goals at Stamford Bridge yesterday than Torres have for Chelsea since he came. Hahahaha!

Lello wrote:http://www.sincearsenallastwonatrophy.co.uk/
It was a solid performance from Arsenal no doubt. We'll still have more to cheer about at the end of the season.
. - MCSam
BigBangBazinga wrote:Idon't care about that 8-2 game, especially when after City beat United 6-1. And we'll see who will ve the better team when Chelsea lose Drogba, Lampard and Terry. Oh, and Roman lmao.
And yeah, it's been 6 years. Will be 6 years for you as well.
I honestly can't see Chelsea improve for the next 2-3 years to come. Mata, Sturrige, Cashley and Luiz. Those are the players I'd rate high when the old guys leave. And Torres is starting to look better and better. I really like him and hope he does great.
I'm not even convinced Chelsea will take 3rd place. We've had a terrible start but we've got 7 wins out of the last 8 games and at the moment we don't even have Sagna (PL's best rb if you ask me) and Wilshere. We've got a world class GK aged 21. Wilshere's 19. I mean, RvP ain't even 30. I think Arsenal's future looks brighter than Chelseas tbh. And we've alteady got the stadium and all that.

cityfan31 wrote:Spent almost a billion? on what? Swear this figure gets higher every year. The difference in cost between the starting line-ups on Sunday wasn't that much and you got absolutely schooled. We put you firmly in your place, just deal with it.


BigBangBazinga wrote:Idon't care about that 8-2 game, especially when after City beat United 6-1. And we'll see who will ve the better team when Chelsea lose Drogba, Lampard and Terry. Oh, and Roman lmao.
BigBangBazinga wrote:And yeah, it's been 6 years. Will be 6 years for you as well.
I honestly can't see Chelsea improve for the next 2-3 years to come. Mata, Sturrige, Cashley and Luiz. Those are the players I'd rate high when the old guys leave. And Torres is starting to look better and better. I really like him and hope he does great.
BigBangBazinga wrote:I'm not even convinced Chelsea will take 3rd place. We've had a terrible start but we've got 7 wins out of the last 8 games and at the moment we don't even have Sagna (PL's best rb if you ask me) and Wilshere. We've got a world class GK aged 21. Wilshere's 19. I mean, RvP ain't even 30. I think Arsenal's future looks brighter than Chelseas tbh. And we've alteady got the stadium and all that.

cityfan31 wrote:On the subject of the 'rags' story - it started nearly 100 years ago of course the story is going to vary. You still have not explained what we are bitter about
.

momentsgolden wrote:Yeah right. Bullshit. United's team was CONSIDERABLY cheaper than City's.
momentsgolden wrote:City has taught us a valuable lesson in humility over the last 50 years by accepting United as the bigger Manchester team.
momentsgolden wrote:But, dont try deny blatant facts- city has used close to a billion dollars in trying to win titles since the owner's takeover. You have NO reserves
momentsgolden wrote:the fans are either bitter United haters or glory hunters. Deal with it.
Especially coming from somebody from Zimbabwe. Bet you are a regular at the Theatre of Dreams, eh? I've been to over 200 city games, what about you mate?

momentsgolden wrote:Now United squad was
De Gea---------------- 16 mil
Rio Ferdinand-------- 30 mil
Smalling--------------- 12 mil
Evra------------------- 5.5 mil
Jonny Evans---------- free
Nani------------------- 25 mil
Ashely Young--------- 15 mil
Darren Fletcher------- free
Anderson-------------- 17 mil
Rooney---------------- 30 mil
Walbeck-------------- free
Javier hernandez---- 6 Mil
Phil Jones------------ 16.5 mil .

mecuryball wrote:cityfan31 wrote:On the subject of the 'rags' story - it started nearly 100 years ago of course the story is going to vary. You still have not explained what we are bitter about
.
we call City 'bitter' because of their bitterness,jealousy,and envy towards United's success.
I'm not denying the 'rags',but the different reasons behind it..
some say its during the time United played at Maine Road,that United use to borrow rags from City,to use as kit,
others say United started calling themselves the rags first, because our kits looked like rag,
now you're saying its because of our low support and our near bankruptcy,during the 20s.
plus the other reasons I've heard..
it seems city supporters don't even know the origin of the word 'rag',they just throw it around for the sake of it,then fabricate their own version of how the term came about....if you want to continue to call United 'rags',even after all we've achieved(the most supported football club the the world and the most valuable sporting franchise in the world,then, you lot should at least come up with a collective reason behind it..
Cheers mate.

cityfan31 wrote:Mate why you bothered about being called rags? It's just a term we've used for years and quite clearly there was some reason for it at the start but it's just a nickname and isn't even an insult. Far better than 'Munichs' anyway.
As for being bitter, City fans would rather cut their own eyes out than support United. Trust me, there is no jealousy. You will never see a City team collapse as pathetically as you lot did on Sunday. 1-6.



Users browsing this forum: No registered users