MikeNUFC wrote:I'd agree that Brent has more depth about his character, but then again, we've only seen Warwick's character for one episode, se he may develop more as the show goes on.
Do you agree that Gervias could be doing something more though? He's an exceptional writer but doesn't seem to step out of his comfort zone, with the whole social awkwardness thing. It's still funny, but because The Office perfected it, I can't help but compare it to that. The characters have fundamental differences but the situations and certain mannerisms are too similar to ignore.
Well yeah he could be doing something more and the whole idea and concept, and even title for 'Life's Too Short' was from Davis. Yet it will go down in history as 'Gervais' creation', which is a little unfair. Even though Gervais / Merchant wrote and directed it, its concept came from Davis.
What Gervais does which is admirable is the same thing that Louis CK does, in, intentionally taking audiences to places they feel uncomfortable in and finding the comedy in them. Exploiting the social anxiety and lack of clarity in these areas, for comedic effect and to openly talk about taboo.
So, it's rarely arbitrary with them. He's using comedy for important ideas.
But yeah I often think that many of my heroes could be doing more. I have ideas constantly that I wish I could just execute with Eminem's talent or Gervais' talent as I feel they're better than a lot of the ideas I see them do themselves. Which seems arrogant but I really do see a lot of geniuses squander their talent in small spaces of interest, and lacking in originality.
Gervais also contradicts himself a lot as he said after 'Cemetery Junction' that they had left that "veil of irony" behind and they'd no longer be laughing at their characters so much as engaging and empathizing with them more. Yet, with 'Life's Too Short' he's gone backwards again.
He also said that comedy without pathos or drama or something underneath it is decapitated laughter and pretty pointless (paraphrasing), and again, with LTS, he said it's 'all funny' and that it's not a comedy/drama but an out-and-out comedy.
His or rather, his and Merchant's (though I think the style is more-so Gervais') style has become very predictable now and watching Davis do those little looks to the camera and the eyebrow raises in awkward moments, and the constant stopping and stuttering in sentences felt like a major repeat and also as if I could do it myself now.
I'm sure it'll still be funny but I think he should be thinking bigger and as much as I love attention to detail and certainly realism, I think he just obsesses far too much on nuanced awkwardness now. I love awkward comedy but... Larry David is an example of somebody who does it better now. You rarely see people stuttering and losing their way on 'Curb' as you do in Gervais' work and yet it feels as, if not more, realistic and cringing.
And David has found a way to exercise often surreal ideas in a realistic context. Which, is better. As he can go more places, it's more flexible, he can think bigger.
One more thing, seems as if Gervais' standards or appreciation of comedic worth are lowering. He said the scene they did with Liam Neeson they feel is maybe the funniest scene they've ever wrote. Which I know they say every series but... it's not even close in my books.
There's a ton of legendary scenes from both 'The Office' and 'Extras' that are SO much funnier than that. Even the 'muffin scene' from 'Extras'. Or the Keith Chegwin scene where he confuses fiction with reality... those ideas and scenes are so so much funnier.