Geno wrote:Well the part about discussing her public Twitter, since she's technically an adult is a grey area. You'd have to ask the admins, but I'm pretty it'd be a no-go (for posting the link to it or telling people how to find it) since I'm assuming it has pictures of her / her sisters and plus they're Em's children regardless of age.
Disclaimer: I'm kind of just arguing with you just for fun here, so don't take this too personally or seriously.
But, yes. She's "Em's 'daughter'" but does that mean we won't be able to judge her on her public behavior and statements (yes, twitter IS public) when she's 30? (If we're talking regardless of age?)
And I agree with you about posting links and whatnot. That's why I refrained from doing that. And I also didn't tell people how to find it. I'm with you there. That seems like more of an invasion to me somehow.
Anyway, I honestly don't think I'll be bringing up her twitter much, (or ever again, really) so I think it's kind of a non-issue.
The thing is (and again, I'm just talking here, not making excuses or saying we should be able to discuss their lives), I think she is well aware that her twitter is "public" and that strangers read it. I don't feel like I'm taking advantage of the innocence of a little girl. In fact, there ARE no pictures of anyone but herself and her friends, which leads me to believe that she realizes people want pictures of Hailie or Whitney or Kim, and doesn't want to incriminate THEM, but that she is freely accepting that pictures of HERSELF and info about HERSELF is going to be out there. In this day and age, having a public internet presence is the norm. It's "normal" to have a public twitter that the whole world can read. It's a bigger deal these days if you CAN'T stalk someone than that you can. the ironic part about this whole "protect his daughters' privacy, they want to be normal" is that if they WERE normal, nothing about their lives would be private. They'd all have public twitters and instagrams (and maybe even facebooks) and every 'private' thing would be publicly displayed. The only difference would be that most people wouldn't know to look for them, but I just don't think people under a certain age consider certain things to be invasions of privacy anymore. Just food for thought.
Again, just rambling here, not dissing you. I'm bored, if you can't tell lol. Feel free to ignore me.
)"
