EminemBase wrote:Eminem isn't questioned in the same light because it's obvious to anyone who understands his music that he's indulging in character, everybody knows his alter-ego and his sense of macabre, there's many layers of provocation and tongue-in-cheek, he's an intelligent, provocative artist.
People know he doesn't really mean it, he was misunderstood and exploits that for art.
Where as Rick Ross is just a fat retard fraud who doesn't know what he wants to portray artistically so is just hopping on the terminology bandwagon and trying to sound a bit badass, when he just made himself sound like a genuine rapist. There's no layers, it just sounds creepy and real.
Most of the people protesting Ross outside of that Reebok store do not understand Eminem's character indulgance. They don't understand much about Hip-Hop art, I'm going to safely assume. So why is it that Eminem has the album Relapse come out and little is heard from groups like the ones protesting Ross? Yet, Eminem has little heard when he has multiple glorifications of rape throughout a whole album.
You just proved Talib's point. Yeah, to me and you it's pretty different. Ross's line sounds creepy and just flat our advocating rape, while Eminem is artistic and does it for the reactions. But to others, is there really a difference? Think of most mothers and older women you know. Most of the people who would likely be in these protests. How in the hell would they know the difference? It's just stupid that we laugh and complain about groups protesting Eminem in 2000/2001 for his anti-gay and anti-women lyrics. But then we agree with those who do it to Ross over ten years later.
To Ross, maybe his line was tongue in cheek. We do not know his intention. Art is art. And maybe it's shallow of us to call Ross "fake" and assume what he was attempting to protray in the lyrics. So like I said, you virtually are proving Talib's point.