So basically me saying "I skimmed your post" is pathetic? And me saying I dissected your post is pathetic? I did dissect it and I did skim the other one. Do you know the meaning of dissect?
TheFreeDictionary.com wrote: To examine, analyze, or criticize in minute detail
So I did go through your post source by source and analyze/criticize it. Nothing wrong with me saying that I did that. Now do you know the meaning of pathetic?
Dictionary.com wrote:causing or evoking pity, sympathetic sadness, sorrow, etc.; pitiful; pitiable: a pathetic letter; a pathetic sight.
Ah, skimming your post and rebutting it piece by piece must have evoked sorrow. That's what you must mean.

Fine fine fine, that doesn't make sense. You probably meant the other definition.
Dictionary.com wrote:miserably or contemptibly inadequate:
It must have been pathetic when I said I skimmed your posts because it was inadequate of me to say it in that manner. I should've posted with more...Gusto. Maybe put on the caps lock here and there, and end it with an exclamation mark.
Now about the argument, CrashBand already acknowledged what you're saying now (bolded part).
CrashBand wrote:Francesco wrote:He worked with ghost writers for the most part actually.
Eedee wrote:For Lost and Found?
Francesco wrote:Definitely if we talk about the whole album & not about any specific song... I am not sure what part or whatever but most likely a chunk of it was written by ghostwriters.
(talking out of your ass on both occasions)
This is when Solace came in saying you were mistaken
Solace wrote:I haven't been able to find anything about anyone ghost writing Lost & Found."
(Which you are now arguing the semantics over Solace thinking the entire Lost & Found was not ghost written).
The bolded part is really all this argument is.