ps3 vs xbox360 (let the games begin)

by **,-,'-{Bar}-',-,** » Mar 29th, '07, 20:37

and as all ready stated PC is the home of GTA

( i just read all posts so im commenting on the things sayed btw )

the graphics and shit is nothing if you dont enjoy a game - thats fact

so all ya'll blue rae hardrive shit is useless if you dont enjoy playing the game

i seen a couple fo people go back in time to PS1 so ill beat you n go back to Snes every idea you all talking about was on a Nintendo console first, all the classsic Play station games ALL started on nintendo consoles near enough every one of them, internet gaming ? started on the snes ( yup in japan )

im done for now too much got sayed n im too bored, i go on gaming sites to discuss this shit :smoking:

and i know the facts so nintendo > all

by **$0 R3@L** » Mar 29th, '07, 20:41

the fact nitendo was made for fat people who where too lazy to excercise without needing a screen infront of them kinda made wii a joke from the start.

i piss on wii hence the name.

by **,-,'-{Bar}-',-,** » Mar 29th, '07, 20:48

$0 R3@L wrote:the fact nitendo was made for fat people who where too lazy to excercise without needing a screen infront of them kinda made wii a joke from the start.

i piss on wii hence the name.

sure so what was play station made for ? coz i dont see no one running around while playing PS3 , do you ?

all gaming was made for poeple to play infront of a screen ( duh ) wether there fat/skinny doesnt matter, there gonni be sitting infront a a screen

oh and another point, PS3 made a brand new controller - wii makes motion sensor console....sony scrap new controller and copy the motion cencsor factor... :8)

sony aint used 1 original idea for gaming not one, neither has xbox although xbox's power can hold some great RPG games witch is great..but not original nor does it matter

by **$0 R3@L** » Mar 29th, '07, 20:58

nitendo only ever made one classic game......mario.everything else was downhill from there.

by **,-,'-{Bar}-',-,** » Mar 29th, '07, 21:09

$0 R3@L wrote:nitendo only ever made one classic game......mario.everything else was downhill from there.

rorlfmao you dunno what your talking about

ok ill name the sony clasic games....wait i mean the third party classic games that give sony the most sales

Resident Evil - ( started on nintendo )

Final Fantasy - ( started on nintendo )

Chrono Cross - ( started on nintendo) - this was a game that boosted the PS1 big time, and supposedly there giving it new life on PS3

Grand Theft Auto - ( started on PC ) - probly PlayStations biggest game and they dont even got full rights to that no more -

all the other stuff Play Station got is on every console..so they have nothing original nor have they created anything classic ( ever ever never ever never ever ) they buy rights to shit thats it, they dont create it

dam even xbox have original games created by microsoft ( fable, unreal tournament, theres more i cant be bothere now but )

now nintendo....alreayd naming the games they created during the nintendo/capcom paternership and nintendo/square partnerships that went bust

have created

Mario - if it wasnt for him all the platform games would have never came to what they are
Samus ( metroid prime ) - great shooter not child-ish
Link ( the legend of zelda ) - adventure game, i wouldnt class it child-ish

thats 3 there are more ( obv. )

and classic games....id be here all day

by **$0 R3@L** » Mar 29th, '07, 21:17

zelda and mario and donkey kong = for kids and early teens.

gamecube flopped :whistle:

there only gimmick is that its small :confusion:

who cares?!?!

all the other stuff Play Station got is on every console..so they have nothing original nor have they created anything classic ( ever ever never ever never ever ) they buy rights to shit thats it, they dont create it

did say create i said 'give birth'.Meaning they made it popluar.Sure pc was the platform it was originally made for but playstation is where gta got its fans.same with all the others u mentioned.

fact is nintendo is nothing compared to xbox and ps.

by **Shads** » Mar 29th, '07, 21:23

Zelda is a good franchise, and isnt childish

look, even proof rocked the Zelda shit

by **$0 R3@L** » Mar 29th, '07, 21:24

shads03 wrote:Zelda is a good franchise, and isnt childish

look, even proof rocked the Zelda shit

lol

r.i.p

by **Shads** » Mar 29th, '07, 21:37

Killa wrote:
Resident Evil - ( started on nintendo )

for real?

dont think so

i believe is was joint started on the Sega Saturn & PS1 back in 96. the earlist resident evil game i can recall that was on nintendo was Resident Evil 2 on the N64 back in 99

by **,-,'-{Bar}-',-,** » Mar 29th, '07, 22:18

shads03 wrote:
Killa wrote:
Resident Evil - ( started on nintendo )

for real?

dont think so

i believe is was joint started on the Sega Saturn & PS1 back in 96. the earlist resident evil game i can recall that was on nintendo was Resident Evil 2 on the N64 back in 99

so tell me why there is a resident evil for the original game boy ? :whistle:

dont start me on this stuff, im a big gaming fan i know da facts :smoking:

by **Deadishot** » Mar 29th, '07, 22:54

damn lots mroe post...

i think the wii is a great system, i have one my self and love it, but if i were to keep 1 system and get rid of another i would keep my 360 (even tho i have 3 of them

)

i think they are more skilled based game, the wii has games that i have more fun than on any other system, and its for teh casual gamer, they wanna have fun therfore wii is a great console that dishes out a ton of fun. the ps2 is jsut playstation... heres a controller heres a game have fun palying single player... than ps3 came and they are going to try online gaming but they will have to cahrge sooner or later if they want a good online support, but most importantly they need good multiplayer games, i havnt heard about any good multiplayer games coming out for hte ps3 but than again i dont follow it at all. the wii shoulda had online support where you can play against each other and made it friggan easier to be friends with someone cuz taht wii code is long, and in this gerneration its seems like its all about graphics and online play and the wii doesnt have either, its still living in the last generation.

by **,-,'-{Bar}-',-,** » Mar 29th, '07, 23:07

Deadishot wrote:damn lots mroe post...

i think the wii is a great system, i have one my self and love it, but if i were to keep 1 system and get rid of another i would keep my 360 (even tho i have 3 of them )

i think they are more skilled based game, the wii has games that i have more fun than on any other system, and its for teh casual gamer, they wanna have fun therfore wii is a great console that dishes out a ton of fun. the ps2 is jsut playstation... heres a controller heres a game have fun palying single player... than ps3 came and they are going to try online gaming but they will have to cahrge sooner or later if they want a good online support, but most importantly they need good multiplayer games, i havnt heard about any good multiplayer games coming out for hte ps3 but than again i dont follow it at all. the wii shoulda had online support where you can play against each other and made it friggan easier to be friends with someone cuz taht wii code is long, and in this gerneration its seems like its all about graphics and online play and the wii doesnt have either, its still living in the last generation.

you make good points man :worship:

only thing to say, the Wii involvment games were youll sit n play for hours arent out yet, but the system will have them they have alot of big names games coming to it :happy: