by ,-,'-{Bar}-',-, » Apr 11th, '08, 10:57
lol thats bullshit.
so your telling me, jay-z isnt a defining artist ? Nas isnt a defining artist ? those 2 guys have been more defining for a longer time.
2 pac wasnt that defining untill he died, after that you got alot of rappers tryna be like pac but none of them actually got signed and made it mainstream, if you think pacs thug image defined loads of artists think again because there were loads of artists doin it before and after pac, he brought it to the mainstream slowly but at the same time so was jay-z, nas, biggie and other artists, infact you could say the core westcoast and eastcoast beefs is what defined that style and brought it out into the mainstream, Snoop, Dre, biggie, outlawz, jay-z, nas, all these artists (and more) were embroiled in fueds witch took that style of hip hop your talking about to the mainstream it wasnt just one artist it was a whole gang of artists, and if you want to "point the finger" at one man, its suge knight coz he masterminded death row and it was that label that got it mainstream. but even before that there was N.W.A that paved the way for the 2 pac's maybe even more so it wasnt N.W.A but it was Ice Cube. that style of hip hop was already goin strong at the time of tupac, the beef's and shootings involved in pacs time in hip hop is what make people think he defined it or was a defining artist, but really he didnt change hip hop nor did he influence it too much, he did leave a great selection of music and he did try and change it and he did try and show that the streets wasnt the only option but it never worked. also i aint taking away from pac he ifnluenced alot of people and his fans are dedicated and im one of them, but hip hop wise on a wider scale he didnt do much to the actual music, he did more on a personel level with his fans (imo)
your theory is full of holes that you havent thought out properly, your acting as if everyone is in the same group, one artist is succesful and one group wanne copy then a completely different artist is succesful and a different group wanne copy and you got loads of guys being succesful and loads wanting to copy.
like someone sayed you'll have the guys with one hit wonders or a couple of years of succes then they die away, there always has been them and there always will be them, the true defining artist are still around 15 years after there debut, Ice Cube, Dre, Rakim, Nas, Wu Tang Clan, KRS-One ect.
those artists are the defining guys who make permenant changes to hip hop, people still bumping gangsta rap ? thanks to ice cube, people still using multis, wordplay and metaphors ? thanks to rakim
and even if they dont know it when there listening to there watered down 50 cent or there lil wayne, they are just filtered copies of the originals, with alot less skill and alot bigger ego's. 50 cent fell off and is still falling, lil wayne will pass and he'll be forgotten about, but i can bet once thats happened wu-tang and ice cube will still have an album coming out.
so anywae ive went of track a bit, but what you classing as defining moments that changed the face of hip hop, isnt that, its just fads/gimmicks/phases that will pass, and once they have passed the truly defining artist are still there.
oh and for the record the last truly defining artist who's back selection of songs will be played throught time was eminem for me and i hope he gets back on his game and makes more albums to cement his place and complete the test of time, and the newest one that i think will reach that level is lupe fiasco, on a mainstream level ofcourse i could go into all the un-signed or underground artists i feel have more defining music but i cant be arsed lol.