Was Scott rightfully banned? You Tell Us!

[Steve Spag]

Who's Scott and why'd he get banned? lol

[Robbie G]

I don't really miss him because for the most part he didn't add anything on topic or constructive. I say let it stay for awhile, and maybe reconsider down the road.

[Boston]

well before i state my opinion, whats with the picture thing he did? the only thing i witnessed was the argument between him and james basically, and with just that i seen i do not think he should be banned. even though i think he was wrong, there are other people here, including james, who was instigating and obviously arguing back, which i dont blame either. i would of probably done the same thing. he did say some shit to you (james) that was uncalled for and i can understand why you feel that way. but ill actually state my whole opinion when i find out more information.

[theJFKshow]

He was a douche

[Tash8]

he was an asshole, but just unban him... we need someone to pick on.

he also didn't do something that most of us haven't, it's just he is hated more than most people on this site.. ya feel me?

[James R.]

@ Boston, this doesn't have anything to do with me really. Apparently he posted pics of someone without their permission which is a ban, and he spent an ENTIRE thread flaming angie for no reason at all. Like doing his best to be as cruel as he possibly could. I was enjoying making him look like a fucking idiot, not that it was hard, but once I saw the stuff he was banned for I could see why he got booted. But obviously I'm biased because I think he's a fucking douche as stated by slimthps

[Boston]

is there a link to this thread where he was flaming angie.
^ that does sound uncall for and he has no reason for that i suppose ( i did not see the thread) and yes it is fucked up he posted pictures without permission.

[gutawafang]

To me Scott's just a cool guy trying to up his posts. He spams quite a lot but i think he just wants some attention. I don't know bout the picture thing and I don't wanna get involved. I don't think he should be banned.

[James R.]

I've been looking for it and can't find it. But it was pretty much just him trying to make her as insecure about herself as he possibly could, and it was just fucked up. None of it was true, but it's the type of things that could affect someone's image of themselves. It didn't work, but it was unacceptable and uncalled for.

[gutawafang]

@ james: was it the leah dizon thread? I think that got deleted. But yeah i saw...all angie said was that she didnt personally find her that attractive or w.e and we went off at her calling her ugly and insulting her for no reason, which MC Annon was a part of aswell rofl..no snitching

i remember it now, finally. but i think i missed the picture scott posted. well, i agree it is FUCKED UP to insult Angie, Scott. But should he really be banned because of that?

[Ivy]

I never met or have heard of this Scott guy, but if what you say is true, you did what you had to do in order to keep peace and other members safe and not feel like their in a corner or being offended. It was rightfully carried out and in the appropriate way...

[James R.]

@ james: was it the leah dizon thread? I think that got deleted. But yeah i saw...all angie said was that she didnt personally find her that attractive or w.e and we went off at her calling her ugly and insulting her for no reason...

Ahhh yeah that was it. Yeah it's definitely gone and it was mad retarded. I think the other member(s) involved were warned as Scott would have been if he weren't already up for spamming, and posting pictures without people's permission.

[Ivy]

you may know him better as SLMacDougall

Recognize the name, but that's about all I can say...

[James R.]

@ james: was it the leah dizon thread? I think that got deleted. But yeah i saw...all angie said was that she didnt personally find her that attractive or w.e and we went off at her calling her ugly and insulting her for no reason...

Ahhh yeah that was it. Yeah it's definitely gone and it was mad retarded. I think the other member(s) involved were warned as Scott would have been if he weren't already up for spamming, and posting pictures without people's permission.

I can think of two other guys who got into it to though, why aren't they banned???

I only remember one of the other people involved, and like I said, it only warranted a warning from what I understand. Had they gone around flaming other members, spamming the forum, and posting pictures they had no right to post they'd be in the same situation as him. Remember everyone, it wasn't just ONE thing that got him Banned. It was the consequences of all the things he'd done that turned out to result in his being banned.

[neversnooze]

i dont have anything against scott, but posting other ppls pictures without authorization is wrong. it would be like posting up somebody phone number, it is personal information that should not be seen by the public without permission.