cityfan31 wrote:AVB has shown his inexperience here.
The media don't have a problem with Chelsea, they had a legitimate argument that Chelsea's season was on the verge of exploding.
Chelsea are 10 points behind City already, they'd lost to QPR, Arsenal, drawn with Genk, lost to Liverpool in the league and the Carling Cup, lost to Bayer Leverkusen and were on the verge of getting knocked out the Champions League.
So where's the persecution?
You won't win the league, or CL, you can't win the Carling Cup. Is the FA cup good enough?
Can't win the Carling Cup? Did you see the team we fielded? It's a cup hardly anyone cares for anyway. AVB was using it to flex our youngsters. But is the cup now held in a higher regard as City are still in contention for it? Wasn't the FA cup good enough for you last season?
In regards to AVB, I think he was mainly addressing how the media said we were in a "crisis" and now the results have turned, they fail to say anything good about Chelsea. How could the media speculate on AVB's job that early, especially how he said a few times Roman backs him? They loved it. What AVB said was justified.
You have been on fire in the PL and you're currently the best team. There's no doubt about that. But you're not these invincibles you seem to perceive City as. The season is still young and anything can happen. You have to play us and Arsenal, if you lose both, Utd can go first.
Outside of England, you have been absolute pants. You were saying how can you be champions of Europe but not your own country, right? Equally, how can teams in your country who finished below you do better in *arguably* a harder competition? I don't care about this lack of "experience" in the City squad. When you spend that amount of money you should expect a solid run and not to be beaten by Napoli. Chelsea's first outing in the CL was good and our players were not "experienced" in the CL or as good as City's current squad. City may prove me wrong today though, but the outcome isn't even in your hands.
/rant over lol