
Geno wrote:I don't wanna have a kid with Zabe tbh.
kokasov wrote:Accor wrote:Kokasov I think you'd have a valid argument if we were talking about a singing voice or something more subjective, you can dissect lyrics and separate good lyricism from bad lyricism.
There's a reason Nas is a respected lyricist and Soulja Boi isn't.
I agree they can be easier to judge, and there are certainly quantifiable aspects- complexity of rhyme scheme, etc.- but this verse has a reasonably complex rhyme scheme.
83A wrote:LOL its funny listening to people bitch about the content matter, its well known he is running out of things to talk about. When he does features he just tries to ride the beat and use different flows. He is going to be selfish and use his creative, emotional and technical material on a solo album in order to make the best album he can.
Accor wrote:kokasov wrote:Accor wrote:Kokasov I think you'd have a valid argument if we were talking about a singing voice or something more subjective, you can dissect lyrics and separate good lyricism from bad lyricism.
There's a reason Nas is a respected lyricist and Soulja Boi isn't.
I agree they can be easier to judge, and there are certainly quantifiable aspects- complexity of rhyme scheme, etc.- but this verse has a reasonably complex rhyme scheme.
I tend to disregard rhymes when the actual lyrics are bad. Sure there's probably some multies but what he's actually saying is stupid and reasonably complex rhymes aren't going to make it much better. [...]
Amadeo wrote:Piece of shit song.
There's a strong correlation between how bad the beat is and how bad Eminem will be. As soon as I heard that 808 sound, I knew it was going to be a shit song.
Geno wrote:I don't wanna have a kid with Zabe tbh.
ray k-47 wrote:I think the verse was good after the rear rear part
kokasov wrote:
My point was clearer if you don't cut me off right after mentioning the rhyme schemes.
That's basically my point. Blu can ask us to explain what's good about it, but pretty much all we can say is "this part was stupid" or "this part was cool/interesting/witty", then he disagrees. Then maybe the whole thing catches on and goes into a
Person1:"well what's witty about it"
Person2:"It had a double meaning/some pun/It just is/It links seemingly unrelated things in a [unquantifiably] graceful way"
Person3:"Just becase it has (whatever person2 said) doesn't mean it's witty"
Person4:"You guys suck"
kokasov wrote:I agree they can be easier to judge, and there are certainly quantifiable aspects- complexity of rhyme scheme, etc.- but this verse has a reasonably complex rhyme scheme. When it comes to things like content, I've only seen it end up like this:
Almostlity wrote:Grow up faggots
EminemInsider wrote:Jesus Christ, HOW FUCKING STUPID ARE YOU PEOPLE?!?!?!?!?!
Blu wrote:It's why tons of people wrote Relapse off, all he was doing was rhyming for the most part. Very few songs where he brought the songs to life and illustrated a story.
Geno wrote:I don't wanna have a kid with Zabe tbh.
Geno wrote:I don't wanna have a kid with Zabe tbh.
Dr.Dre wrote:Hell Yeah
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot]