I'd argue that it's not. Hiphop is simply poetry + rhythm. Once you lose rhythm/multi's you're not longer rapping. You're just talking. So I think it's perfectly within their right to sacrifice for them. When I hear someone sacrifice rhyme & rhythm to shove in everything they have to say it's like nails on a chalkboard. I almost always prefer a verse to be jampacked with multi's and as many different flows as possible. Now, I don't expect everybody to share that preference with me, but there's people that do (such as Tech N9ne and Crooked I) who full-well understand lyricism and what they're hearing.CrashBand wrote:It is a flaw, lol.
I'd argue that it is objectively worse than not sacrificing what you are saying.
But you can still prefer stuff that is worse
To me this:
http://youtu.be/D2ieoiOsLGo?t=2m37s
Sounds way better than this:
http://youtu.be/vL5sdu3pNrU?t=15s
Does that mean Tech's is just objectively better? No. But I like it a whole lot more and I'd be pissed if there weren't any artists out there providing it. You have to look at artists for what they offer, as opposed to what you think they should be. Otherwise bullshit arguments start up and we end up with 40 useless threads in the em section