BILI wrote:Ofc it is idiot and Nas sucks even more tbh
BILI wrote:Nas sucks
bigray wrote:BILI wrote:I really love pac...but lyrically he just wasnt that good...
What does lyrical mean to you? Pac fits every aspect of being lyrical.Notalius wrote:@Bigray
Have you ever listened to Slick Rick ? since you're saying pac is the best storyteller ever
Big was great too. Even Immortal T.
where did you read that i said he's the best story teller ever? you didnt i said imo he is...ive learned a long time ago that tr isn't a place to talk about tupac because very few of you know how good pac actually was.
bigray wrote:Notalius wrote:Mainly because the guys that we consider goats are superior in every aspect of rap compared to pac
Like who lol
Trimss wrote:Don't act like rhyming isn't important though. It's not the most important aspect BUT someone who can tell a great story while rhyming a lot > someone who can tell a story but who doesn't try to rhyme.
Rhyming sounds smooth to the ear most of the times.
bigray wrote:StayWideAwake wrote:I'll be honest, I didn't even know people didn't consider him a goat.
It's because of the zero sense that members post when it comes to opinions about tupac.
Mr.DGAF wrote:Pac is one of my all time favorites. He might not be the most technically skilled writer, but his rhyming isn't bad, and not nearly bad enough to discredit him as a rapper. People that dismiss him instantly as a poor lyricist fail to recognize rhyming along doesn't equal lyricism.
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot]